Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35140239›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Convolutional mesh autoencoders for the 3-dimensional identification of FGFR-related craniosynostosis.

Eimear O' Sullivan, Lara S van de Lande, Athanasios Papaioannou, Richard W F Breakey, N Owase Jeelani, Allan Ponniah, Christian Duncan, Silvia Schievano, Roman H Khonsari, Stefanos Zafeiriou and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. 3D Generative Model Latent Disentanglement via Local Eigenprojection.Computer graphics forum : journal of the European Association for Computer Graphics · 2023
    Article
  7. Applications of 3D Photography in Craniofacial Surgery.Journal of pediatric neurosciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Eimear O' Sullivan *UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Lara S van de Lande *UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK. l.lande@ucl.ac.uk.
Athanasios PapaioannouUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Richard W F BreakeyUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
N Owase JeelaniUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Allan PonniahDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Royal. Free Hospital, London, UK.
Christian DuncanCraniofacial Unit, Alder Hey Childrens Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Silvia SchievanoUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Roman H KhonsariDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery and Plastic Surgery, Necker - Enfants Malades University Hospital, Paris, France.
Stefanos Zafeiriou *Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK.
David J Dunaway *UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical diagnosis of craniofacial anomalies requires expert knowledge. Recent studies have shown that artificial intelligence (AI) based facial analysis can match the diagnostic capabilities of expert clinicians in syndrome identification. In general, these systems use 2D images and analyse texture and colour. They are powerful tools for photographic analysis but are not suitable for use with medical imaging modalities such as ultrasound, MRI or CT, and are unable to take shape information into consideration when making a diagnostic prediction. 3D morphable models (3DMMs), and their recently proposed successors, mesh autoencoders, analyse surface topography rather than texture enabling analysis from photography and all common medical imaging modalities and present an alternative to image-based analysis. We present a craniofacial analysis framework for syndrome identification using Convolutional Mesh Autoencoders (CMAs). The models were trained using 3D photographs of the general population (LSFM and LYHM), computed tomography data (CT) scans from healthy infants and patients with 3 genetically distinct craniofacial syndromes (Muenke, Crouzon, Apert). Machine diagnosis outperformed expert clinical diagnosis with an accuracy of 99.98%, sensitivity of 99.95% and specificity of 100%. The diagnostic precision of this technique supports its potential inclusion in clinical decision support systems. Its reliance on 3D topography characterisation make it suitable for AI assisted diagnosis in medical imaging as well as photographic analysis in the clinical setting.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceComputer SimulationCraniosynostosesFaceHeadHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalInfantTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID35140239
PMCPMC8828904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.