Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35140171›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2022

Understanding the dynamics of notification and implementation of Article 5.3 across India's states and union territories.

Shalini Bassi, Rob Ralston, Monika Arora, Aastha Chugh, Gaurang P Nazar, Jeff Collin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shalini BassiHRIDAY, Delhi, India shalini@hriday-shan.org.
Rob RalstonGlobal Health Policy Unit, School of Social and Political Science, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8664-3565
Monika AroraHRIDAY, Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9987-3933
Aastha ChughHRIDAY, Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6669-3394
Gaurang P NazarHRIDAY, Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7025-2946
Jeff CollinGlobal Health Policy Unit, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
University of Edinburgh · GBNational Institution for Transforming India Aayog · IN

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P027946/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn federal systems, state and local governments may offer opportunities for innovation in implementing the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). This paper explores the implementation of WHO FCTC Article 5.3 within India's federal system, examining how its guidelines have been operationalised across states and union territories.

methodsInterviews with officials from government and civil society organisations across key states, and a document review of state government and district administration notifications adopting Article 5.3 guidelines between 2015 and 2019.

resultsThe data reveal subnational leadership in formulating intersectoral committees, which are designed to limit interactions with the tobacco industry, and corresponding measures to reject partnership and conflicts of interest for government officials. There are notable omissions across states and union territories in adoption of key Article 5.3 guidelines; only four districts and state governments refer to regulating aspects of 'socially responsible' industry activities, and no notifications include measures to prevent the tobacco industry receiving preferential treatment or requiring that information provided by industry actors be transparent and accountable. Interview data indicate that dynamics of notification across states have been shaped by lesson drawing and the catalytic role of civil society. The adoption of protocols is impacting on the practices of health officials, but there are concerns about engagement by other departments and the regulatory capacity of empowered committees.

conclusionThe spread of state- and district-level policies illustrates opportunities federal structures can provide for accelerating tobacco control. Given significant omissions and policy tensions, there remains a need for national action to build on these innovations, including in revisions to India's tobacco control legislation.

Indexed as

Tobacco IndustryTobacco ProductsHumansIndiaSmoking PreventionWorld Health Organizationlow/middle income countrypublic policytobacco industry

Identifiers

PMID35140171
PMCPMC9125360
OpenAlexW4210901284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.