Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35140163›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Combined online interactive mindfulness and exercise programme (MOVE-Online) compared with a self-management guide for adults with chronic pain: protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial.

Orla Deegan, Brona M Fullen, Maire-Brid Casey, Ricardo Segurado, Conor Hearty, Catherine M Doody

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04899622 (Mindfulness Combined With Virtual Exercise Online), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04899622 nacompletednot on this map

Mindfulness Combined With Virtual Exercise Online (MOVE) Compared With a Self-Management Guide for Adults With Chronic Pain: Study Protocol for a Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorOrla DeeganRan2021 to 2022Enrolled96ConditionsChronic PainArmsMBSR, Exercise, Online Self-Management Guide
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Orla DeeganSchool of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland orla.deegan@ucdconnect.ie.ORCID 0000-0002-3571-9950
Brona M FullenSchool of Public Health Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Maire-Brid CaseySchool of Public Health Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Ricardo SeguradoCSTAR, School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Conor HeartyDepartment of Pain Medicine, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Catherine M DoodySchool of Public Health Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
University College Dublin · IEMater Misericordiae University Hospital · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOnline pain management programmes (PMP) have growing evidence as effective interventions for individuals with chronic pain (CP). Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) is a psychological intervention proven to be effective in the management of CP. There is also a large body of evidence for the efficacy of exercise in the management of CP however, there are limited studies combining both these interventions and none to date delivering a combined intervention in the form of an online PMP. This study aims to explore the acceptability and feasibility of delivering a combined MBSR and exercise online PMP for adults with CP, and will examine the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial of a combined MBSR and exercise online programme compared with an online self-management guide. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A parallel-group, feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted among participants in Ireland, which will include an embedded qualitative study. Seventy-five participants will complete an online consent form and be individually randomised to one of two groups. Group A will participate in live online MBSR and supervised exercise sessions (2 hours MBSR, 1 hour exercise) once a week for 8 weeks. Group B will receive access to an 8-week online self-management guide, released biweekly and containing eight self-directed modules. Analyses of the feasibility study will be descriptive and will address the outcomes relating to the feasibility and acceptability of the interventions and procedures of the study including recruitment and eligibility, data collection methods, intervention adherence, engagement and attrition rates, intervention acceptability and participants' subjective perceptions of the programmes. Comparisons of clinical treatment effects, using validated patient-reported outcome measures will be explored descriptively to consider the viability of investigating a combined online MBSR and exercise intervention in a future fully powered RCT. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the Mater Misericordiae University Hospital Institutional Review Board (1/378/2124) and the University College Dublin Human Research Ethics Committee (LS-20-76-Deegan-Doody). Informed consent will be obtained from each participant prior to randomisation. The results of this feasibility study will be published in peer-reviewed academic journals and presented at national and international conferences.

trial registrationNCT04899622.

Indexed as

Chronic PainMindfulnessSelf-ManagementAdultExercise TherapyFeasibility StudiesHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicpain managementrehabilitation medicinetelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35140163
PMCPMC8830222
OpenAlexW4210895764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.