ArticleBMJ open2022
At the frontlines of digitisation: a qualitative study on the challenges and opportunities in maintaining accurate, complete and timely digital health records in India's government health system.
Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of a direct to beneficiary mobile communication program on reproductive and child health outcomes: a randomised controlled trial in India.BMJ global health · 2022Trial
- Transitioning to a digital TB case-based surveillance system: a mixed-methods study of the DHIS2 TB e-Tracker system.IJTLD open · 2026Article
- From Peer Support to Program Supervision: Qualitative Insights on WhatsApp as Informal Digital Infrastructure for Community Health Workers and Public Health Officers in an Indian High-Priority Aspirational District.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Implementation Status and Usability of Digital Health Interventions Among Health Care Workers and End Users at the Primary Health Care Level in Chandigarh, North India: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Article
- Integrating digital health competencies in community-engaged medical education: A scoping review for developing teaching and learning strategies for digital health.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Review
- Barriers and facilitators for the use of telehealth by healthcare providers in India-A systematic review.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- A systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis of factors affecting mHealth adoption in India.Oxford open digital health · 2024Article
- Barriers and facilitators of using health information technologies by women: a scoping review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- A Strategic Research Framework for Defeating Diabetes in India: A 21st-Century Agenda.Journal of the Indian Institute of Science · 2023Review
- Article
- Optimising the reach of mobile health messaging programmes: an analysis of system generated data for the Kilkari programme across 13 states in India.BMJ global health · 2022Review
- Experiences of community health workers on adopting mHealth in rural Malawi: A qualitative study.Digital healthArticle
- Perception and Experiences of Auxiliary Nurse Midwives in using the ANMOL Application: A Qualitative Study Based on Training Needs.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social MedicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo understand factors underpinning the accuracy and timeliness of mobile phone numbers and other health information captured in India's government registry for pregnant and postpartum women. Accurate and timely registration of mobile phone numbers is necessary for beneficiaries to receive mobile health services.
settingMadhya Pradesh and Rajasthan states in India at the community, clinical, and administrative levels of the health system.
participantsInterviews (n=59) with frontline health workers (FLHWs), data entry operators, and higher level officials. Focus group discussions (n=12) with pregnant women to discuss experiences with sharing data in the health system. Observations (n=9) of the process of digitization and of interactions between stakeholders for data collection. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Thematic analysis identified how key actors experienced the data collection and digitisation process, reasons for late or inaccurate data, and mechanisms that can bolster timeliness and accuracy.
resultsPregnant women were comfortable sharing mobile numbers with health workers, but many were unaware that their data moved beyond their FLHW. FLHWs valued knowing up-to-date beneficiary mobile numbers, but felt little incentive to ensure accuracy in the digital record system. Delays in registering pregnant women in the online portal were attributed to slow movement of paper records into the digital system and difficulties in gathering required documents from beneficiaries. Data, including women's phone numbers, were handwritten and copied multiple times by beneficiaries and health workers with variable literacy. Supervision tended to focus on completeness rather than accuracy. Health system actors noted challenges with the digital system but valued the broader project of digitisation.
conclusionsIncreased focus on training, supportive supervision, and user-friendly data processes that prioritise accuracy and timeliness should be considered. These inputs can build on existing positive patient-provider relationships and health system actors' enthusiasm for digitisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.