Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35140124›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022

Disruption of DNA Repair and Survival Pathways through Heat Shock Protein Inhibition by Onalespib to Sensitize Malignant Gliomas to Chemoradiation Therapy.

Jihong Xu, Pei-Jung Wu, Tzung-Huei Lai, Pratibha Sharma, Alessandro Canella, Alessandra M Welker, Christine E Beattie, J Brad Elder, Michelle Easley, Russell Lonser and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Glioblastoma research on zebrafish xenograft models: a systematic review.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jihong Xu *Division of Neuro-oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Pei-Jung Wu *Division of Neuro-oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Tzung-Huei LaiDivision of Hematology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Pratibha SharmaDivision of Neuro-oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-7070-3025
Alessandro CanellaDivision of Neuro-oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Alessandra M WelkerDepartment of Neuroscience, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Christine E BeattieDepartment of Neuroscience, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
J Brad ElderDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Michelle EasleyDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Russell LonserDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Naduparambil K JacobDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-4056-2863
Maciej PietrzakDepartment of Bioinformatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Cynthia M TimmersDepartment of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0002-0509-0805
Frederick LangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0003-3747-873X
Deepa Sampath *Department of Hematopoietic Biology and Malignancy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Vinay K Puduvalli *Division of Neuro-oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
The Ohio State University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USMedical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Characterization of Onalespib, A novel long acting Hsp90 inhibitor, as a chemo and radiosensitizer in Adults with Newly Diagnosed GlioblastomaR01CA235673 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI PUDUVALLI, VINAY K, SAMPATH, DEEPA · 2019 to 2024
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA235673
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProficient DNA repair by homologous recombination (HR) facilitates resistance to chemoradiation in glioma stem cells (GSC). We evaluated whether compromising HR by targeting HSP90, a molecular chaperone required for the function of key HR proteins, using onalespib, a long-acting, brain-penetrant HSP90 inhibitor, would sensitize high-grade gliomas to chemoradiation in vitro and in vivo. EXPERIMENTAL

designThe ability of onalespib to deplete HR client proteins, impair HR repair capacity, and sensitize glioblastoma (GBM) to chemoradiation was evaluated in vitro in GSCs, and in vivo using zebrafish and mouse intracranial glioma xenograft models. The effects of HSP90 inhibition on the transcriptome and cytoplasmic proteins was assessed in GSCs and in ex vivo organotypic human glioma slice cultures.

resultsTreatment with onalespib depleted CHK1 and RAD51, two key proteins of the HR pathway, and attenuated HR repair, sensitizing GSCs to the combination of radiation and temozolomide (TMZ). HSP90 inhibition reprogrammed the transcriptome of GSCs and broadly altered expression of cytoplasmic proteins including known and novel client proteins relevant to GSCs. The combination of onalespib with radiation and TMZ extended survival in a zebrafish and a mouse xenograft model of GBM compared with the standard of care (radiation and TMZ) or onalespib with radiation.

conclusionsThe results of this study demonstrate that targeting HR by HSP90 inhibition sensitizes GSCs to radiation and chemotherapy and extends survival in zebrafish and mouse intracranial models of GBM. These results provide a preclinical rationale for assessment of HSP90 inhibitors in combination with chemoradiation in patients with GBM.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBrain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaGliomaAnimalsBenzamidesCell Line, TumorDNA RepairHeat-Shock ProteinsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansIsoindolesMiceTemozolomideXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysZebrafish(2,4-dihydroxy-5-isopropylphenyl)-(5-(4-methylpiperazin-1-ylmethyl)-1,3-dihydroisoindol-2-yl)methanoneAntineoplastic AgentsBenzamidesHeat-Shock ProteinsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsIsoindolesTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID35140124
PMCPMC9064967
OpenAlexW4210954532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.