Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35140106›Full record

ReviewEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2022

Management of

Kartik Kumar, Charles L Daley, David E Griffith, Michael R Loebinger

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Detection ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Eravacycline forMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. BioluminescentFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Efficacies of sequenced monotherapies ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. TheMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
  17. Microbial Clearance of RefractoryPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Reactive Oxygen Detoxification Contributes tobioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kartik KumarNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3142-5795
Charles L DaleyDivision of Mycobacterial and Respiratory Infections, Dept of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA.
David E GriffithDivision of Mycobacterial and Respiratory Infections, Dept of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA.
Michael R LoebingerNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK m.loebinger@rbht.nhs.uk.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBNational Jewish Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM-PD) remains a challenging condition to diagnose and treat effectively. Treatment of NTM-PD is prolonged, frequently associated with adverse effects and has variable success. In this review, we consider the factors influencing clinicians when treating NTM-PD and discuss outcomes from key studies on the pharmacological management of

Indexed as

Lung DiseasesMycobacterium abscessusMycobacterium avium-intracellulare InfectionHumansLungMycobacterium avium Complex

Identifiers

PMID35140106
PMCPMC9488909
OpenAlexW4210914333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.