ArticleSystematic reviews2022
Prevalence of complications in eyes with nanophthalmos or microphthalmos: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cataract and glaucoma surgery in microphthalmic, nanophthalmic, and high hyperopic eyes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2026Pooled it
- Risk factors for glaucoma in nanophthalmos - a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Pooled it
- Nanophthalmos presenting with acute refractory angle-closure glaucoma: acute-phase histopathological evidence and bilateral comparative findings.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Modular surgical approach for angle-closure glaucoma secondary to nanophthalmos.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Comparison of outcomes after early congenital cataract surgery in eyes with/without microcornea.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Posterior Microphthalmos With RPE Dysfunction Misdiagnosed as Macular Edema.Case reports in ophthalmological medicine · 2025Article
- Kenny-Caffey Syndrome Type 2 (KCS2): A New Case Report and Patient Follow-Up Optimization.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Nanophthalmos with Foveal Hypoplasia and Wrinkling of Macular Mound Caused by Novel Biallelic PRSS56 Variants: A Case Report.Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO · 2024Article
- Article
- Bibliometric analysis of microphthalmos and anophthalmos over 20 years: from 2004 to 2023.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Article
- Insight into small eyes: a practical description from phenotypes presentations to the management.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Review
- Posterior Microphthalmos Pigmentary Retinopathy Syndrome with Angle-Closure Glaucoma: A Case Report.Journal of current ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMicrophthalmos and nanophthalmos are uncommon ocular conditions, whereby affected eyes have smaller dimensions compared to the normal population. Microphthalmos and nanophthalmos present several challenges to ophthalmologists; they have spontaneous and post-operative sequelae such as high hyperopia, angle-closure glaucoma, uveal effusion syndrome, and retinal detachment. This systematic review and meta-analysis intends to assess the prevalence of both the spontaneous complications associated with nanophthalmos and microphthalmos, as well as the post-surgical complications associated with nanophthalmos or microphthalmos. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Articles will be searched for, on four online databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science. Two independent reviewers will identify the studies according to prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria. All studies included with participants diagnosed with microphthalmos or nanophthalmos in one or both eyes, will be included if they have (i) more than 4 cases and (ii) defined microphthalmos/nanophthalmos as an axial length of < 21 mm or a high lens/eye volume ratio. Nanophthalmos may have an additional diagnostic criterion of posterior wall thickness greater than 1.7 mm. The prevalence of the following complications will be assessed: high hyperopia (spherical equivalent >3D), angle closure glaucoma, uveal effusion syndrome, retinal detachment, and chorioretinal folds. Studies that will be excluded are those that have not adequately defined the criteria for the diagnosis of nanophthalmos or microphthalmos, those studies that have less than five cases, studies with criteria not defined above, and deemed unsuitable, and studies in languages other than English with no published translation. Relevant data will be extracted and assessed for the risk of bias in each article using a modified Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) assessment tool. The data will then be pooled to determine the prevalence of complications among patients with microphthalmos and nanophthalmos. If the data allows, subgroup analysis will be carried out according to axial length as well as subtype of microphthalmos/nanophthalmos (simple, complex, relative anterior, and posterior). DISCUSSION: Although nanophthalmos is an uncommon condition that affects the eye, its management and complications can be sight-threatening. Thus, it is important to counsel patients and their families correctly (in the case of children) upon diagnosis and prior to any surgical intervention. This can only be done if the overall prevalence of complications is known. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42021227847.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.