Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35139859›Full record

ArticleChiropractic & manual therapies2022

The primary spine practitioner as a new role in healthcare systems in North America.

Donald R Murphy, Brian Justice, Christopher G Bise, Michael Timko, Joel M Stevans, Michael J Schneider

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Donald R MurphyDepartment of Family Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 133 Dellwood Road, Cranston, RI, 02920, USA.
Brian JusticeExcellus BlueCross BlueShield, 165 Court Street, Rochester, NY, 14647, USA.
Christopher G BiseDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Bridgeside Point 1, 100 Technology Drive, Suite 210, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219-3130, USA.
Michael TimkoDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Bridgeside Point Suite 228, 100 Technology Drive, Suite 210, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219-3130, USA.
Joel M StevansDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Bridgeside Point 1, 100 Technology Drive, Suite 500, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219-3130, USA.
Michael J SchneiderDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Bridgeside Point 1, 100 Technology Drive, Suite 500, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219-3130, USA. mjs5@pitt.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7190-3379
University of Pittsburgh · USBrown University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn an article published in 2011, we discussed the need for a new role in health care systems, referred to as the Primary Spine Practitioner (PSP). The PSP model was proposed to help bring order to the chaotic nature of spine care. Over the past decade, several efforts have applied the concepts presented in that article. The purpose of the present article is to discuss the ongoing need for the PSP role in health care systems, present persistent barriers, report several examples of the model in action, and propose future strategies. MAIN BODY: The management of spine related disorders, defined here as various disorders related to the spine that produce axial pain, radiculopathy and other related symptoms, has received significant international attention due to the high costs and relatively poor outcomes in spine care. The PSP model seeks to bring increased efficiency, effectiveness and value. The barriers to the implementation of this model have been significant, and responses to these barriers are discussed. Several examples of PSP integration are presented, including clinic systems in primary care and hospital environments, underserved areas around the world and a program designed to reduce surgical waiting lists. Future strategies are proposed for overcoming the continuing barriers to PSP implementation in health care systems more broadly.

conclusionSignificant progress has been made toward integrating the PSP role into health care systems over the past 10 years. However, much work remains. This requires substantial effort on the part of those involved in the development and implementation of the PSP model, in addition to support from various stakeholders who will benefit from the proposed improvements in spine care.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareSpinal DiseasesAmbulatory Care FacilitiesHumansReferral and ConsultationSurveys and QuestionnairesChiropracticHealth care reformHealth policyImplementation scienceLow back painNeck painPhysical therapyPhysiotherapyPrimary careSpine

Identifiers

PMID35139859
PMCPMC8826679
OpenAlexW4210838439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.