Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35139838›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Intervention by a clinical pharmacist carried out at discharge of elderly patients admitted to the internal medicine department: influence on readmissions and costs.

Andrea Lázaro Cebas, José Manuel Caro Teller, Carmen García Muñoz, Carlos González Gómez, José Miguel Ferrari Piquero, Carlos Lumbreras Bermejo, José Antonio Romero Garrido, Juana Benedí González

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Economic Evaluation of Pharmacist-Led Digital Health Interventions: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrea Lázaro CebasPharmacy Management Department. Dirección General de Asistencia Sanitaria, Servicio Murciano de Salud, Murcia, Spain. andrea.lazaro@carm.es.
José Manuel Caro TellerPharmacy Department. Hospital, Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Carmen García MuñozPharmacy Department. Hospital, Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos González GómezServicio de Medicina Interna Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
José Miguel Ferrari PiqueroPharmacy Department. Hospital, Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos Lumbreras BermejoServicio de Medicina Interna Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
José Antonio Romero GarridoPharmacy Department Hospital, Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Juana Benedí GonzálezPharmacology Department. Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

Fundación Mapfre Primitivo de Vega grant, 2016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient education on pharmacological treatment could reduce readmissions. Our objective was to carry out a pharmacist intervention focused on providing information about high-risk medications to chronic patients and to analyse its influence on readmissions and costs.

methodsA single-centre study with an intervention group and a retrospective control group was conducted. The intervention was carried out in all polymedicated patients ≥ 65 years who were admitted to internal medicine and signed the informed consent between June 2017 and February 2018. Patients discharged to nursing homes or long-term hospitals were excluded. The control group were all the patients who were admitted during the same months of 2014 who met the same inclusion criteria. The patients were classified according to the HOSPITAL score as having a low, intermediate, or high risk of potentially avoidable readmission. Outcome measures were 30-day readmission and cost data. To analyse the effect of the intervention on readmission, a logistic regression was performed.

resultsThe study included 589 patients (286 intervention group; 303 control group). The readmission rate decreased from 20.13% to 16.43% in the intervention group [OR = 0.760 95% CI (0.495-1.166); p = 0.209)]. The incremental cost for the intervention to prevent one readmission was €3,091.19, and the net cost saving was €1,301.26. In the intermediate- and high-risk groups, readmissions were reduced 10.91% and 10.00%, and the net cost savings were €3,3143.15 and €3,248.71, respectively.

conclusionsThe pharmacist intervention achieved savings in the number of readmissions, and the net cost savings were greater in patients with intermediate and high risks of potentially avoidable readmission according to the HOSPITAL score.

Indexed as

Patient DischargePharmacistsAgedHumansInternal MedicinePatient ReadmissionRetrospective StudiesAgedCost analysisPatient readmissionPharmacistsPolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID35139838
PMCPMC8827191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.