Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35139831›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2022

Readiness to enter the workforce: perceptions of health professions students at a regional Australian university.

Bunmi S Malau-Aduli, Karina Jones, Faith Alele, Mary D Adu, Aaron Drovandi, Gillian Knott, Louise Young, Clara Jo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Work readiness of pharmacy graduates: An exploratory study.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bunmi S Malau-AduliCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, QLD 4811, Townsville, Queensland, Australia. bunmi.malauaduli@jcu.edu.au.
Karina JonesCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, QLD 4811, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Faith AleleCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, QLD 4811, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Mary D AduCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, QLD 4811, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Aaron DrovandiCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, QLD 4811, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Gillian KnottCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, QLD 4811, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Louise YoungCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, QLD 4811, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Clara JoCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, QLD 4811, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
James Cook University · AU

Funding

College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University College of Medicine and Dentistry Research Support Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerceived readiness for practice can help mitigate the stress and uncertainty associated with transitioning from university into the workforce. This study aimed to identify factors influencing the readiness for clinical practice among final-year medical, dental, and pharmacy students at an Australian regional university.

methodsThe study utilised a sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach with surveys administered for the quantitative phase and interviews/focus groups for the qualitative phase. Descriptive statistics and inductive thematic analysis were utilised for the quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. Triangulation of findings from both phases facilitated in-depth understanding of the factors that influenced participants' self-perceived readiness for clinical practice.

resultsFrom the three disciplines, 132 students completed the survey and 14 participated in the focus groups and interviews. Students felt most prepared in their patient-centred capabilities, core skills, and advanced consultation skills, and least prepared in their system-related capabilities and clinical care skills. Themes identified as essential enablers and confidence builders in relation to workforce readiness in all three disciplines were: gained knowledge and skills, value of clinical placement experiences, support from peers, family and staff. However, students felt their work-readiness was impaired by heavy academic workloads and poor knowledge of health care systems, which affected skills development. Participants suggested additional support in health care system and clinical governance, mental healthcare, and induction to placement sites to further improve their work readiness.

conclusionsThe findings of this study suggest that improving work-readiness of healthcare students requires alignment of learning needs to real-world practice opportunities, ensuring support systems are appropriate, and early familiarisation with the healthcare system.

Indexed as

Students, Health OccupationsUniversitiesAustraliaHealth OccupationsHumansWorkforceClinical practiceMixed-methodsStudent supportTrainingWork-readiness

Identifiers

PMID35139831
PMCPMC8827198
OpenAlexW4211016565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.