Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35139807›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2022

Colorectal cancer community engagement: a qualitative exploration of American Indian voices from North Dakota.

Nicole Redvers, Mia Wilkinson, Courtney Fischer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Colorectal Cancer in the American Indian and Alaska Native Community: A Holistic Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Colorectal cancer screening barriers, facilitators, and promotion recommendations by Alaska Native people who are non-adherent to colorectal cancer screening.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicole RedversDepartment of Family & Community Medicine, University of North Dakota School of Medicine & Health Sciences, ND, Grand Forks, USA. nicole.redvers@und.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8521-2130
Mia WilkinsonDepartment of Indigenous Health, University of North Dakota School of Medicine & Health Sciences, ND, Grand Forks, USA.
Courtney FischerDepartment of Indigenous Health, University of North Dakota School of Medicine & Health Sciences, ND, Grand Forks, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8703-3419
University of North Dakota · US

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM128729 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA · PI BASSON, MARC D. · 2018 to 2022
$20.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM128729NIGMS NIH HHS U54GM128729
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmerican Indians (AI) in North Dakota present with higher rates of advanced-stage disease for screening detectable colorectal cancers and have lower overall baseline colorectal cancer screening rates than non-AIs. We sought to identify the perceived barriers and facilitators for the engagement with colorectal cancer prevention within North Dakota tribal communities.

methodsTwelve semi-structured interviews were carried out across four tribal reservation communities in the state of North Dakota with American Indian adults between the ages of 30 and 75 years. We utilized purposive sampling to ensure maximum variation in age, sex, and tribal community until data saturation was achieved. The interviews were transcribed, and thematic analysis was carried out to identify consistent themes rooted within the data. Ethical approval was gained for this project from all relevant institutional review boards.

resultsFour main themes were identified as barriers for the engagement with colorectal cancer prevention, including: colorectal cancer screening barriers, focused on other health problems, lack of colorectal cancer tailored health promotion, and socio-cultural factors affecting colorectal cancer prevention. Three main themes were identified as facilitators for the engagement with colorectal cancer prevention, including: reasons for getting colorectal cancer screening, role of culture, and getting out into the community.

conclusionThere is need for more community-rooted, strengths-based approaches to colorectal cancer prevention activities in AI communities in North Dakota. Socio-cultural factors, such as the use of storytelling, and the use of traditional knowledge have been demonstrated to be an important element of consideration for colorectal cancer tribal community engagement and prevention planning in the state.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAmerican Indian or Alaska NativeColorectal NeoplasmsCultureEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth PromotionHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorth DakotaPatient Acceptance of Health CareQualitative ResearchAmerican IndianCancer educationCancer preventionColorectal cancerCommunity engagementNorth Dakota

Identifiers

PMID35139807
PMCPMC8827199
OpenAlexW4210860887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.