Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35139805›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2022

Psychosocial aspects and support networks associated with disability in two longevous populations in Brazil: a cross-sectional study.

Júlia Cristina Leite Nóbrega, Juliana Barbosa Medeiros, Javanna Lacerda Gomes da Silva Freitas, Jaíza M M Silva, Raisa Fernandes Mariz Simões, Ricardo Olinda, Jair Lício de Ferreira Santos, Tarciana Nobre Menezes, Yeda Aparecida de Oliveira Duarte, Mayana Zatz and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Júlia Cristina Leite NóbregaPublic Health Program, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB), Campina Grande, Brazil.
Juliana Barbosa MedeirosPublic Health Program, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB), Campina Grande, Brazil.
Javanna Lacerda Gomes da Silva FreitasPublic Health Program, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB), Campina Grande, Brazil.
Jaíza M M SilvaPublic Health Program, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB), Campina Grande, Brazil.
Raisa Fernandes Mariz SimõesPublic Health Program, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB), Campina Grande, Brazil.
Ricardo OlindaDepartment of Statistics, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB), Campina Grande, Brazil.
Jair Lício de Ferreira SantosDepartment of Social Medicine, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Tarciana Nobre MenezesPublic Health Program, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB), Campina Grande, Brazil.
Yeda Aparecida de Oliveira DuarteDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mayana ZatzHuman Genome Studies Center, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
David MathesonFaculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK.
Silvana SantosPublic Health Program, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB), Campina Grande, Brazil. silvanaipe@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5252-0206

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmong the oldest old, aged 80 years and over, the prevalence of disability is higher than in other age groups and can be considered a predictor of mortality.

objectiveTo evaluate how psychosocial aspects and support networks influence the disability of these oldest-old individuals, performing a comparison between two longevous populations, one living in one of the poorest regions of Brazil, in the backlands of Paraíba, and another living in one of the largest urban centres in Latin America.

methodA cross-sectional study in which 417 oldest-old persons aged 80 years and older were interviewed, with data collected through the "Health, Welfare and Ageing" survey conducted in two Brazilian cities. Disability was assessed by reporting the need for assistance in Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs). Bivariate and multiple analyses were performed using R statistical software.

resultsFood insufficiency in the first years of life had negative repercussions on the disability of oldest old people living in the northeast. On the other hand, in this region, older people have a higher rate of support and live longer with their peers, which may contribute to reducing feelings of loneliness, depressive symptoms, and worse self-perception of health. In the Southeast, financial constraints, subjective poverty, and unmet needs may favour the development of functional limitations between long-lived people.

conclusionOur findings indicate that regional differences in Brazil may influence the disability of older people aged 80 and older. In northeast Brazil, having no partner may contribute to disability for ADLs and IADLs; while, in the longevous population of São Paulo, having a worse self-rated health may contribute to disability for IADLs.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingPersons with DisabilitiesAgedAged, 80 and overAgingBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesHumans80 and overActivities of daily livingAgedAgeingPhysical functional performancePsychologySocial support

Identifiers

PMID35139805
PMCPMC8826700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.