Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35139572›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2022

Impact of Carbohydrate Counting Method during Pregnancy in Women with Pregestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Controlled Clinical Trial.

Larissa Mello de Oliveira, Gabriella Pinto Belfort, Patricia de Carvalho Padilha, Eliane Lopes Rosado, Letícia Barbosa Gabriel da Silva, Sanmira Fagherazzi, Lenita Zajdenverg, Roberto Luís Zagury, Claudia Saunders

Open access · diamondAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Larissa Mello de OliveiraPrograma de Pós-graduação em Nutrição do Instituto de Nutrição Josué de Castro da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9870-2358
Gabriella Pinto BelfortPrograma de Pós-graduação em Nutrição do Instituto de Nutrição Josué de Castro da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2066-7446
Patricia de Carvalho PadilhaPrograma de Pós-graduação em Nutrição do Instituto de Nutrição Josué de Castro da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0221-7732
Eliane Lopes RosadoPrograma de Pós-graduação em Nutrição do Instituto de Nutrição Josué de Castro da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0889-4662
Letícia Barbosa Gabriel da SilvaPrograma de Pós-graduação em Nutrição do Instituto de Nutrição Josué de Castro da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2205-0212
Sanmira FagherazziMaternidade Escola da UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5137-9389
Lenita ZajdenvergMaternidade Escola da UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1579-3299
Roberto Luís ZaguryMaternidade Escola da UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0438-223X
Claudia SaundersPrograma de Pós-graduação em Nutrição do Instituto de Nutrição Josué de Castro da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8815-6736
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the effect of the carbohydrate counting method (CCM) on glycemic control, maternal, and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with pregestational diabetes mellitus (DM).

methodsNonrandomized controlled clinical trial performed with 89 pregnant women who had pregestational DM and received prenatal care in a public hospital in Rio de Janeiro, state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, between 2009 and 2014, subdivided into historic control group and intervention group, not simultaneous. The intervention group (

resultsOnly the CCM group showed a reduction in fasting blood glucose. Postprandial blood glucose decreased in the 2

conclusionBoth methods of nutritional guidance contributed to the reduction of postprandial glycemia of women and no differences were observed for maternal and perinatal outcomes. However, CCM had a better effect on postprandial glycemia and only this method contributed to reducing fasting blood glucose throughout the intervention. REBEC CLINICAL TRIALS DATABASE: The present study was registered in the ReBEC Clinical Trials Database (Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos, number RBR-524z9n).

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalPregnancy in DiabeticsBlood GlucoseBrazilFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal CareBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID35139572
PMCPMC9948103
OpenAlexW4211053546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.