ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2022
Integrating landmark modeling framework and machine learning algorithms for dynamic prediction of tuberculosis treatment outcomes.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- New Strategies in Tuberculosis Prediction: TB-CAST, an Explainable Baseline Score for Two-Month Sputum Culture Positivity.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Predicting unfavorable tuberculosis outcomes using machine learning: a prospective cohort.Tropical medicine and health · 2026Article
- Loc646329 sponges miR-21 to reduce RAS/MAP kinase signaling pathway in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Article
- Development of a clinical prediction model for poor treatment outcomes in the intensive phase in patients with initial treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- A conceptual framework on determinants of the integrated tuberculosis control model implementation in China.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Therapeutic Potential of Alpha-pinene in Breast Cancer: Targeting miR-21 and PTEN Gene Expression.Galen medical journal · 2024Article
- A hierarchical multilabel graph attention network method to predict the deterioration paths of chronic hepatitis B patients.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
- Using an Artificial Intelligence Approach to Predict the Adverse Effects and Prognosis of Tuberculosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A nomogram for predicting mortality of patients initially diagnosed with primary pulmonary tuberculosis in Hunan province, China: a retrospective study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
- Dynamic Risk Prediction via a Joint Frailty-Copula Model and IPD Meta-Analysis: Building Web Applications.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of mortality in lung cancer: Application of severity-adjustment method.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to establish an informative dynamic prediction model of treatment outcomes using follow-up records of tuberculosis (TB) patients, which can timely detect cases when the current treatment plan may not be effective. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe used 122 267 follow-up records from 17 958 new cases of pulmonary TB in the Republic of Moldova. A dynamic prediction framework integrating landmark modeling and machine learning algorithms was designed to predict patient outcomes during the course of treatment. Sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated to evaluate performance of the model at critical time points. New measures were defined to determine when follow-up laboratory tests should be conducted to obtain most informative results.
resultsThe random-forest algorithm performed better than support vector machine and penalized multinomial logistic regression models for predicting TB treatment outcomes. For all 3 outcome classes (ie, cured, not cured, and died after 24 months following treatment initiation), sensitivity and PPV of prediction models improved as more follow-up information was collected. Specifically, sensitivity and PPV increased from 0.55 to 0.84 and from 0.32 to 0.88, respectively, for the not cured class.
conclusionThe dynamic prediction framework utilizes longitudinal laboratory test results to predict patient outcomes at various landmarks. Sputum culture and smear results are among the important variables for prediction; however, the most recent sputum result is not always the most informative one. This framework can potentially facilitate a more effective treatment monitoring program and provide insights for policymakers toward improved guidelines on follow-up tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.