Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35139537›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal2022

Targeted proteomics improves cardiovascular risk prediction in secondary prevention.

Nick S Nurmohamed, João P Belo Pereira, Renate M Hoogeveen, Jeffrey Kroon, Jordan M Kraaijenhof, Farahnaz Waissi, Nathalie Timmerman, Michiel J Bom, Imo E Hoefer, Paul Knaapen and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
24.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Nick S NurmohamedDepartment of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9045-6009
João P Belo PereiraDepartment of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3564-8742
Renate M HoogeveenDepartment of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0292-9940
Jeffrey KroonDepartment of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9983-6614
Jordan M KraaijenhofDepartment of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7566-6403
Farahnaz WaissiDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Division of Surgical Specialties, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1745-0222
Nathalie TimmermanDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Division of Surgical Specialties, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5400-4195
Michiel J BomDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6326-7437
Imo E HoeferCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8379-7814
Paul KnaapenDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8038-7898
Alberico L CatapanoDepartment of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milan, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7593-2094
Wolfgang KoenigDeutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2064-9603
Dominique de KleijnDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Division of Surgical Specialties, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2714-2140
Frank L J VisserenDepartment of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3951-5223
Evgeni LevinDepartment of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Erik S G StroesDepartment of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9555-6260
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUtrecht University · NLUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsCurrent risk scores do not accurately identify patients at highest risk of recurrent atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in need of more intensive therapeutic interventions. Advances in high-throughput plasma proteomics, analysed with machine learning techniques, may offer new opportunities to further improve risk stratification in these patients. METHODS AND

resultsTargeted plasma proteomics was performed in two secondary prevention cohorts: the Second Manifestations of ARTerial disease (SMART) cohort (n = 870) and the Athero-Express cohort (n = 700). The primary outcome was recurrent ASCVD (acute myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, and cardiovascular death). Machine learning techniques with extreme gradient boosting were used to construct a protein model in the derivation cohort (SMART), which was validated in the Athero-Express cohort and compared with a clinical risk model. Pathway analysis was performed to identify specific pathways in high and low C-reactive protein (CRP) patient subsets. The protein model outperformed the clinical model in both the derivation cohort [area under the curve (AUC): 0.810 vs. 0.750; P < 0.001] and validation cohort (AUC: 0.801 vs. 0.765; P < 0.001), provided significant net reclassification improvement (0.173 in validation cohort) and was well calibrated. In contrast to a clear interleukin-6 signal in high CRP patients, neutrophil-signalling-related proteins were associated with recurrent ASCVD in low CRP patients.

conclusionA proteome-based risk model is superior to a clinical risk model in predicting recurrent ASCVD events. Neutrophil-related pathways were found in low CRP patients, implying the presence of a residual inflammatory risk beyond traditional NLRP3 pathways. The observed net reclassification improvement illustrates the potential of proteomics when incorporated in a tailored therapeutic approach in secondary prevention patients.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisBrain IschemiaCardiovascular DiseasesStrokeC-Reactive ProteinHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansProteomicsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSecondary PreventionC-Reactive ProteinASCVDC-reactive proteinMachine learningNLRP3ProteomicsRisk score

Identifiers

PMID35139537
PMCPMC9020984
OpenAlexW4210537932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.