Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35139478›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2022

White matter volume loss drives cortical reshaping after thalamic infarcts.

Julian Conrad, Maximilian Habs, Ria M Ruehl, Rainer Bögle, Matthias Ertl, Valerie Kirsch, Ozan E Eren, Sandra Becker-Bense, Thomas Stephan, Frank A Wollenweber and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Julian ConradDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; German Centre for Vertigo and Balance Disorders (DSGZ), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany. Electronic address: Julian.conrad@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Maximilian HabsDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; German Centre for Vertigo and Balance Disorders (DSGZ), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.
Ria M RuehlDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; German Centre for Vertigo and Balance Disorders (DSGZ), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.
Rainer BögleDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; Munich Centre of Neuroscience, Munich, Germany.
Matthias ErtlDepartment of Psychology, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Valerie KirschDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; German Centre for Vertigo and Balance Disorders (DSGZ), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.
Ozan E ErenDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.
Sandra Becker-BenseDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; German Centre for Vertigo and Balance Disorders (DSGZ), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.
Thomas StephanDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.
Frank A WollenweberInstitute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; Department of Neurology, Helios Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Marco DueringInstitute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany.
Peter Zu EulenburgGerman Centre for Vertigo and Balance Disorders (DSGZ), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; Munich Centre of Neuroscience, Munich, Germany; Institute for Neuroradiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.
Marianne DieterichDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; German Centre for Vertigo and Balance Disorders (DSGZ), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; Munich Centre of Neuroscience, Munich, Germany; Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DELMU Klinikum · DEBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Munich · DEHelios Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden · DEUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe integration of somatosensory, ocular motor and vestibular signals is necessary for self-location in space and goal-directed action. We aimed to detect remote changes in the cerebral cortex after thalamic infarcts to reveal the thalamo-cortical connections necessary for multisensory processing and ocular motor control.

methodsThirteen patients with unilateral ischemic thalamic infarcts presenting with vestibular, somatosensory, and ocular motor symptoms were examined longitudinally in the acute phase and after six months. Voxel- and surface-based morphometry were used to detect changes in vestibular and multisensory cortical areas and known hubs of central ocular motor processing. The results were compared with functional connectivity data in 50 healthy volunteers.

resultsPatients with paramedian infarcts showed impaired saccades and vestibular perception, i.e., tilts of the subjective visual vertical (SVV). The most common complaint in these patients was double vision or vertigo / dizziness. Posterolateral thalamic infarcts led to tilts of the SVV and somatosensory deficits without vertigo. Tilts of the SVV were higher in paramedian compared to posterolateral infarcts (median 11.2° vs 3.8°). Vestibular and ocular motor symptoms recovered within six months. Somatosensory deficits persisted. Structural longitudinal imaging showed significant volume reduction in subcortical structures connected to the infarcted thalamic nuclei (vestibular nuclei region, dentate nucleus region, trigeminal root entry zone, medial lemniscus, superior colliculi). Volume loss was evident in connections to the frontal, parietal and cingulate lobes. Changes were larger in the ipsilesional hemisphere but were also detected in homotopical regions contralesionally. The white matter volume reduction led to deformation of the cortical projection zones of the infarcted nuclei.

conclusionsWhite matter volume loss after thalamic infarcts reflects sensory input from the brainstem as well the cortical projections of the main affected nuclei for sensory and ocular motor processing. Changes in the cortical geometry seem not to reflect gray matter atrophy but rather reshaping of the cortical surface due to the underlying white matter atrophy.

Indexed as

Vestibule, LabyrinthWhite MatterCerebral CortexCerebral InfarctionHumansThalamusOcular motorStrokeThalamusVbmVestibular

Identifiers

PMID35139478
PMCPMC8844789
OpenAlexW4210272776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.