Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35139457›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2022

Deep learning methods for 3D structural proteome and interactome modeling.

Dongjin Lee, Dapeng Xiong, Shayne Wierbowski, Le Li, Siqi Liang, Haiyuan Yu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Computational Methods for Protein Tertiary Structure Analysis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. AlphaFold, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Allostery.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dongjin LeeDepartment of Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; Weill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Dapeng XiongDepartment of Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; Weill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Shayne WierbowskiDepartment of Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; Weill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Le LiDepartment of Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; Weill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Siqi LiangDepartment of Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; Weill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Haiyuan YuDepartment of Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; Weill Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. Electronic address: haiyuan.yu@cornell.edu.

Funding

Structure, Function, and Dynamics of Macro-molecular Complexes that Execute and Regulate Genome FunctionRM1GM139738 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI Thomas George Wade Graham, Steven Zvi Josefowicz · 2021 to 2026
$14.4M
New Generation DelPhi: large systems and beyond electrostaticsR01GM093937 · NIGMS · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI ALEXOV, EMIL GEORGIEV · 2010 to 2023
$4.3M
Quantifying molecular consequences of human missense variants with large-scale interactome perturbation studiesR01GM125639 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI ALEXOV, EMIL GEORGIEV, CLARK, ANDREW G · 2018 to 2021
$2.6M
Towards a comprehensive multiscale 3D human interactome networkR01GM124559 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI YU, HAIYUAN · 2017 to 2020
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM093937NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124559NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM125639NIGMS NIH HHS RM1 GM139738
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bolstered by recent methodological and hardware advances, deep learning has increasingly been applied to biological problems and structural proteomics. Such approaches have achieved remarkable improvements over traditional machine learning methods in tasks ranging from protein contact map prediction to protein folding, prediction of protein-protein interaction interfaces, and characterization of protein-drug binding pockets. In particular, emergence of ab initio protein structure prediction methods including AlphaFold2 has revolutionized protein structural modeling. From a protein function perspective, numerous deep learning methods have facilitated deconvolution of the exact amino acid residues and protein surface regions responsible for binding other proteins or small molecule drugs. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of recent deep learning methods applied in structural proteomics.

Indexed as

Deep LearningProteomeComputational BiologyProtein ConformationProtein FoldingProteome

Identifiers

PMID35139457
PMCPMC8957610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.