Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35139376›Full record

ArticleCell reports2022

Network inference with Granger causality ensembles on single-cell transcriptomics.

Atul Deshpande, Li-Fang Chu, Ron Stewart, Anthony Gitter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evaluating the Utilities of Foundation Models in Single-Cell Data Analysis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Multi-omic network inference from time-series data.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Hypergraph reconstruction from dynamics.Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Atul DeshpandeDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA; Morgridge Institute for Research, Madison, WI 53715, USA.
Li-Fang ChuMorgridge Institute for Research, Madison, WI 53715, USA.
Ron StewartMorgridge Institute for Research, Madison, WI 53715, USA.
Anthony GitterMorgridge Institute for Research, Madison, WI 53715, USA; Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI 53792, USA. Electronic address: gitter@biostat.wisc.edu.
Morgridge Institute for Research · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Project 3: Modulation of the head and neck tumor immune microenvironment by targeting the TAM family of receptorsP50CA278595 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI David J Beebe · 2022 to 2026
$12.5M
Project 4: Role of Receptor Tyrosine Kinase AXL in HNSCC Therapy ResistanceP50DE026787 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HARARI, PAUL M · 2016 to 2020
$10.8M
Midwest Progenitor Cell ConsortiumU01HL099773 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI THOMSON, JAMES ALEXANDER · 2009 to 2015
$7.8M
Retinal tissue chips for ocular disease modelingUH3TR000506 · NCATS · MORGRIDGE INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH, INC. · PI THOMSON, JAMES ALEXANDER · 2014 to 2016
$6.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UH3 TR000506NCI NIH HHS P50 CA278595NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL099773NIDCR NIH HHS P50 DE026787
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular gene expression changes throughout a dynamic biological process, such as differentiation. Pseudotimes estimate cells' progress along a dynamic process based on their individual gene expression states. Ordering the expression data by pseudotime provides information about the underlying regulator-gene interactions. Because the pseudotime distribution is not uniform, many standard mathematical methods are inapplicable for analyzing the ordered gene expression states. Here we present single-cell inference of networks using Granger ensembles (SINGE), an algorithm for gene regulatory network inference from ordered single-cell gene expression data. SINGE uses kernel-based Granger causality regression to smooth irregular pseudotimes and missing expression values. It aggregates predictions from an ensemble of regression analyses to compile a ranked list of candidate interactions between transcriptional regulators and target genes. In two mouse embryonic stem cell differentiation datasets, SINGE outperforms other contemporary algorithms. However, a more detailed examination reveals caveats about poor performance for individual regulators and uninformative pseudotimes.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAlgorithmsAnimalsCell DifferentiationComputational BiologyGene Regulatory NetworksMiceSoftwareTranscriptomemouse embryonic stem cellsnetwork evaluationpseudotimetime series analysistranscriptional regulation

Identifiers

PMID35139376
PMCPMC9093087
OpenAlexW4210881488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.