ReviewBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2022
Performance optimization in DNA short-read alignment.
Review in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative virome analysis of lake and domestic wastewater revealed the unexpected presence of swine acute diarrhea syndrome coronavirus andFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Use of the CHM13-T2T genome improves metagenomic analysis by minimizing host DNA contamination.mSystems · 2025Article
- Aerospace Mutagenized Tea Tree Increases Rhizospheric Microorganisms, Enhances Nutrient Conversion Capacity and Promotes Growth.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Combined metabolome and transcriptome analysis reveal the mechanism of water stress in Ophiocordyceps sinensis.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- An updated resource for the detection of protein-coding circRNA with CircProPlus.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- RepEnTools: an automated repeat enrichment analysis package for ChIP-seq data reveals hUHRF1 Tandem-Tudor domain enrichment in young repeats.Mobile DNA · 2024Article
- A compressive seeding algorithm in conjunction with reordering-based compression.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Benchmarking of five NGS mapping tools for the reference alignment of bacterial outer membrane vesicles-associated small RNAs.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Article
- Short-read aligner performance in germline variant identification.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
summaryOver the past decade, short-read sequence alignment has become a mature technology. Optimized algorithms, careful software engineering and high-speed hardware have contributed to greatly increased throughput and accuracy. With these improvements, many opportunities for performance optimization have emerged. In this review, we examine three general-purpose short-read alignment tools-BWA-MEM, Bowtie 2 and Arioc-with a focus on performance optimization. We analyze the performance-related behavior of the algorithms and heuristics each tool implements, with the goal of arriving at practical methods of improving processing speed and accuracy. We indicate where an aligner's default behavior may result in suboptimal performance, explore the effects of computational constraints such as end-to-end mapping and alignment scoring threshold, and discuss sources of imprecision in the computation of alignment scores and mapping quality. With this perspective, we describe an approach to tuning short-read aligner performance to meet specific data-analysis and throughput requirements while avoiding potential inaccuracies in subsequent analysis of alignment results. Finally, we illustrate how this approach avoids easily overlooked pitfalls and leads to verifiable improvements in alignment speed and accuracy. CONTACT: richard.wilton@jhu.edu. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Appendices referenced in this article are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.