Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35139149›Full record

ReviewBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2022

Performance optimization in DNA short-read alignment.

Richard Wilton, Alexander S Szalay

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Richard WiltonDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1263-5532
Alexander S SzalayDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.

Funding

A Software Framework for Exploring 1,000 Genomes of African DescentR01HL129239 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BARNES, KATHLEEN C, SALZBERG, STEVEN L. · 2015 to 2017
$1.4M
The Terabase Search EngineR01HG007196 · NHGRI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SALZBERG, STEVEN L. · 2014 to 2016
$1.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG007196NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL129239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryOver the past decade, short-read sequence alignment has become a mature technology. Optimized algorithms, careful software engineering and high-speed hardware have contributed to greatly increased throughput and accuracy. With these improvements, many opportunities for performance optimization have emerged. In this review, we examine three general-purpose short-read alignment tools-BWA-MEM, Bowtie 2 and Arioc-with a focus on performance optimization. We analyze the performance-related behavior of the algorithms and heuristics each tool implements, with the goal of arriving at practical methods of improving processing speed and accuracy. We indicate where an aligner's default behavior may result in suboptimal performance, explore the effects of computational constraints such as end-to-end mapping and alignment scoring threshold, and discuss sources of imprecision in the computation of alignment scores and mapping quality. With this perspective, we describe an approach to tuning short-read aligner performance to meet specific data-analysis and throughput requirements while avoiding potential inaccuracies in subsequent analysis of alignment results. Finally, we illustrate how this approach avoids easily overlooked pitfalls and leads to verifiable improvements in alignment speed and accuracy. CONTACT: richard.wilton@jhu.edu. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Appendices referenced in this article are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSoftwareAlgorithmsSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID35139149
PMCPMC10060706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.