Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35139136›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2022

Social determinants of antenatal depression and anxiety among women in South Asia: A systematic review & meta-analysis.

Nafisa Insan, Anthony Weke, Simon Forrest, Judith Rankin

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nafisa InsanPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8483-7486
Anthony WekePopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3486-0802
Simon ForrestDepartment of Sociology, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.
Judith RankinPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Newcastle University · GBDurham University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnancy is a time of major psychological changes making pregnant women more susceptible to depression and anxiety. Prevalence is higher among women living in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan, compared to high-income countries, due to poor understanding and lack of mental health integration within antenatal care. Antenatal depression/anxiety is associated with adverse outcomes including postnatal depression, low birth weight and impaired fetal development. Existing systematic reviews provided only limited information on the social determinants of antenatal depression/anxiety in these South Asian countries.

objectiveThis review aimed to identify, synthesise and appraise the evidence on the social determinants associated with antenatal depression and anxiety in women living in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan.

methodsWe searched five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science) and PROSPERO. Observational studies published between 1st January 2000 and 4th January 2021 were included if they were in the English language, used validated tools for measuring depression/anxiety in pregnant women and reported statistical associations or raw numbers. Summary estimates were obtained using random-effects model. Heterogeneity and publication bias was measured using the I2 statistic and Egger's test, respectively. This review was registered on PROSPERO (reference: CRD42020167903).

resultsWe included 34 studies (with 27,379 women). Meta-analysis of Adjusted Odds Ratios (AOR) found that Intimate partner violence (AOR 2.48, 95% CI 1.41-4.33), unplanned pregnancy (AOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.28-1.83), male gender preference (AOR 3.06, 95% CI 1.40-6.72) and poor relationship with in-laws (AOR 2.69, 95% CI 1.25-5.80) were significantly associated with antenatal depression/anxiety.

conclusionThe review identified a complex range of social determinants of antenatal depression and anxiety in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan. Screening tools to identify pregnant women at high risk should be integrated within antenatal care to prevent adverse outcomes. Knowledge of these social determinants will inform the development of such screening tools and interventions.

Indexed as

AnxietyAnxiety DisordersAsiaDepressionDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornIntimate Partner ViolencePregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal CarePrevalenceSocial Determinants of Health

Identifiers

PMID35139136
PMCPMC8827460
OpenAlexW4210848433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.