Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35139093›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

No sonographer, no radiologist: New system for automatic prenatal detection of fetal biometry, fetal presentation, and placental location.

Junior Arroyo, Thomas J Marini, Ana C Saavedra, Marika Toscano, Timothy M Baran, Kathryn Drennan, Ann Dozier, Yu Tina Zhao, Miguel Egoavil, Lorena Tamayo and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Junior ArroyoLaboratorio de Imágenes Médicas, Departamento de Ingeniería, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima, Peru.
Thomas J MariniDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1529-5097
Ana C SaavedraLaboratorio de Imágenes Médicas, Departamento de Ingeniería, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima, Peru.
Marika ToscanoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Timothy M BaranDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Kathryn DrennanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Ann DozierDepartment of Public Health, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Yu Tina ZhaoDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Miguel EgoavilResearch & Development, Medical Innovation & Technology, Lima, Perú.
Lorena TamayoResearch & Development, Medical Innovation & Technology, Lima, Perú.
Berta RamosDepartment of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
Benjamin CastanedaLaboratorio de Imágenes Médicas, Departamento de Ingeniería, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima, Peru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound imaging is a vital component of high-quality Obstetric care. In rural and under-resourced communities, the scarcity of ultrasound imaging results in a considerable gap in the healthcare of pregnant mothers. To increase access to ultrasound in these communities, we developed a new automated diagnostic framework operated without an experienced sonographer or interpreting provider for assessment of fetal biometric measurements, fetal presentation, and placental position. This approach involves the use of a standardized volume sweep imaging (VSI) protocol based solely on external body landmarks to obtain imaging without an experienced sonographer and application of a deep learning algorithm (U-Net) for diagnostic assessment without a radiologist. Obstetric VSI ultrasound examinations were performed in Peru by an ultrasound operator with no previous ultrasound experience who underwent 8 hours of training on a standard protocol. The U-Net was trained to automatically segment the fetal head and placental location from the VSI ultrasound acquisitions to subsequently evaluate fetal biometry, fetal presentation, and placental position. In comparison to diagnostic interpretation of VSI acquisitions by a specialist, the U-Net model showed 100% agreement for fetal presentation (Cohen's κ 1 (p<0.0001)) and 76.7% agreement for placental location (Cohen's κ 0.59 (p<0.0001)). This corresponded to 100% sensitivity and specificity for fetal presentation and 87.5% sensitivity and 85.7% specificity for anterior placental location. The method also achieved a low relative error of 5.6% for biparietal diameter and 7.9% for head circumference. Biometry measurements corresponded to estimated gestational age within 2 weeks of those assigned by standard of care examination with up to 89% accuracy. This system could be deployed in rural and underserved areas to provide vital information about a pregnancy without a trained sonographer or interpreting provider. The resulting increased access to ultrasound imaging and diagnosis could improve disparities in healthcare delivery in under-resourced areas.

Indexed as

BiometryFetusPlacentaUltrasonography, PrenatalAdultDeep LearningFemaleGestational AgeHumansLabor PresentationPeruPregnancyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID35139093
PMCPMC8827457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.