Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35139088›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Differential gene expression analysis following olfactory learning in honeybee (Apis mellifera L.).

Muhammad Fahad Raza, Muhammad Anwar, Arif Husain, Muhmmad Rizwan, Zhiguo Li, Hongyi Nie, Pavol Hlaváč, M Ajmal Ali, Ahmed Rady, Songkun Su

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Imbalance inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Muhammad Fahad RazaCollege of Animal Sciences (College of Bee Science), Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6237-7960
Muhammad AnwarGuangdong Technology Research Center for Marine Algal Bioengineering, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Plant Epigenetics, College of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Arif HusainDepartment of Soil and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Ghazi University Dera Ghazi Khan, Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan.
Muhmmad RizwanCollege of Animal Sciences (College of Bee Science), Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Zhiguo LiCollege of Animal Sciences (College of Bee Science), Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Hongyi NieCollege of Animal Sciences (College of Bee Science), Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Pavol HlaváčDepartment of Integrated Forest and Landscape Protection, Faculty of Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-3730-1873
M Ajmal AliDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed RadyDepartment of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Songkun SuCollege of Animal Sciences (College of Bee Science), Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University · CNKing Saud University · SAGhazi University · PKShenzhen University · CNTechnická univerzita vo Zvolene · SK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insects change their stimulus-response through the perception of associating these stimuli with important survival events such as rewards, threats, and mates. Insects develop strong associations and relate them to their experiences through several behavioral procedures. Among the insects, Apis species, Apis mellifera ligustica are known for their outstanding ability to learn with tremendous economic importance. Apis mellifera ligustica has a strong cognitive ability and promising model species for investigating the neurobiological basis of remarkable olfactory learning abilities. Here we evaluated the olfactory learning ability of A. mellifera by using the proboscis extension reflex (PER) protocol. The brains of the learner and failed-learner bees were examined for comparative transcriptome analysis by RNA-Seq to explain the difference in the learning capacity. In this study, we used an appetitive olfactory learning paradigm in the same age of A. mellifera bees to examine the differential gene expression in the brain of the learner and failed-learner. Bees that respond in 2nd and 3rd trials or only responded to 3rd trials were defined as learned bees, failed-learner individuals were those bees that did not respond in all learning trials The results indicate that the learning ability of learner bees was significantly higher than failed-learner bees for 12 days. We obtained approximately 46.7 and 46.4 million clean reads from the learner bees failed-learner bees, respectively. Gene expression profile between learners' bees and failed-learners bees identified 74 differentially expressed genes, 57 genes up-regulated in the brains of learners and 17 genes were down-regulated in the brains of the bees that fail to learn. The qRT-PCR validated the differently expressed genes. Transcriptome analyses revealed that specific genes in learner and failed-learner bees either down-regulated or up-regulated play a crucial role in brain development and learning behavior. Our finding suggests that down-regulated genes of the brain involved in the integumentary system, storage proteins, brain development, sensory processing, and neurodegenerative disorder may result in reduced olfactory discrimination and olfactory sensitivity in failed-learner bees. This study aims to contribute to a better understanding of the olfactory learning behavior and gene expression information, which opens the door for understanding of the molecular mechanism of olfactory learning behavior in honeybees.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingLearningAnimalsBeesBrainGene Expression RegulationSmellTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID35139088
PMCPMC8827436
OpenAlexW4210823448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.