ArticleIEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics2022
Brain MR Atlas Construction Using Symmetric Deep Neural Inpainting.
Article in IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Neuroimage analysis using artificial intelligence approaches: a systematic review.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Pooled it
- Deformation registration based on reconstruction of brain MRI images with pathologies.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2025Article
- FastSurfer parcellation accuracy after lesion filling in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- FastSurfer-LIT: Lesion inpainting tool for whole-brain MRI segmentation with tumors, cavities, and abnormalities.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Tagged-MRI Sequence to Audio Synthesis via Self Residual Attention Guided Heterogeneous Translator.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Modeling statistical properties of anatomical structures using magnetic resonance imaging is essential for revealing common information of a target population and unique properties of specific subjects. In brain imaging, a statistical brain atlas is often constructed using a number of healthy subjects. When tumors are present, however, it is difficult to either provide a common space for various subjects or align their imaging data due to the unpredictable distribution of lesions. Here we propose a deep learning-based image inpainting method to replace the tumor regions with normal tissue intensities using only a patient population. Our framework has three major innovations: 1) incompletely distributed datasets with random tumor locations can be used for training; 2) irregularly-shaped tumor regions are properly learned, identified, and corrected; and 3) a symmetry constraint between the two brain hemispheres is applied to regularize inpainted regions. Henceforth, regular atlas construction and image registration methods can be applied using inpainted data to obtain tissue deformation, thereby achieving group-specific statistical atlases and patient-to-atlas registration. Our framework was tested using the public database from the Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation challenge. Results showed increased similarity scores as well as reduced reconstruction errors compared with three existing image inpainting methods. Patient-to-atlas registration also yielded better results with improved normalized cross-correlation and mutual information and a reduced amount of deformation over the tumor regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.