Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35138896›Full record

ArticleScience advances2022

Modes of information flow in collective cohesion.

Sulimon Sattari, Udoy S Basak, Ryan G James, Louis W Perrin, James P Crutchfield, Tamiki Komatsuzaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sulimon SattariResearch Center of Mathematics for Social Creativity, Research Institute for Electronic Science, Hokkaido University Kita 20, Nishi 10, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 001-0020, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7648-592X
Udoy S BasakResearch Center of Mathematics for Social Creativity, Research Institute for Electronic Science, Hokkaido University Kita 20, Nishi 10, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 001-0020, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8650-4581
Ryan G JamesReddit Inc., 420 Taylor Street, San Francisco, CA 94102, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2149-9085
Louis W PerrinResearch Center of Mathematics for Social Creativity, Research Institute for Electronic Science, Hokkaido University Kita 20, Nishi 10, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 001-0020, Japan.
James P CrutchfieldDepartment of Physics, Complexity Sciences Center, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4466-5410
Tamiki KomatsuzakiResearch Center of Mathematics for Social Creativity, Research Institute for Electronic Science, Hokkaido University Kita 20, Nishi 10, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 001-0020, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7175-8474

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pairwise interactions are fundamental drivers of collective behavior-responsible for group cohesion. The abiding question is how each individual influences the collective. However, time-delayed mutual information and transfer entropy, commonly used to quantify mutual influence in aggregated individuals, can result in misleading interpretations. Here, we show that these information measures have substantial pitfalls in measuring information flow between agents from their trajectories. We decompose the information measures into three distinct modes of information flow to expose the role of individual and group memory in collective behavior. It is found that decomposed information modes between a single pair of agents reveal the nature of mutual influence involving many-body nonadditive interactions without conditioning on additional agents. The pairwise decomposed modes of information flow facilitate an improved diagnosis of mutual influence in collectives.

Identifiers

PMID35138896
PMCPMC8827646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.