Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35138877›Full record

SynthesisHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)2022

Oral Antihypertensives for Nonsevere Pregnancy Hypertension: Systematic Review, Network Meta- and Trial Sequential Analyses.

Jeffrey N Bone, Akshdeep Sandhu, Edgardo D Abalos, Asma Khalil, Joel Singer, Sarina Prasad, Shazmeen Omar, Marianne Vidler, Peter von Dadelszen, Laura A Magee

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Blood pressure-lowering treatment for pregnant women with non-severe hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Hypertension Management in Pregnancy and Postpartum.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Does geographical location impact the efficacy of oral antihypertensive therapy in pregnancy?Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Jeffrey N BoneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia (UBC), Canada (J.N.B., A.S., S.P., S.O., M.V.).ORCID 0000-0001-7704-1677
Akshdeep SandhuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia (UBC), Canada (J.N.B., A.S., S.P., S.O., M.V.).ORCID 0000-0001-5194-7892
Edgardo D AbalosCentro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales, Rosario, Argentina (E.D.A.).
Asma KhalilFetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St George's University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom (A.K.).ORCID 0000-0003-2802-7670
Joel SingerSchool of Population and Public Health, UBC, Canada (J.S.).ORCID 0000-0002-7220-4382
Sarina PrasadDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia (UBC), Canada (J.N.B., A.S., S.P., S.O., M.V.).ORCID 0000-0001-7922-3650
Shazmeen OmarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia (UBC), Canada (J.N.B., A.S., S.P., S.O., M.V.).
Marianne VidlerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia (UBC), Canada (J.N.B., A.S., S.P., S.O., M.V.).ORCID 0000-0002-7633-8812
Peter von DadelszenDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, United Kingdom (P.v.D., L.A.M.).ORCID 0000-0003-4136-3070
Laura A MageeDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, United Kingdom (P.v.D., L.A.M.).ORCID 0000-0002-1355-610X
University of British Columbia · CAKing's College London · GBCentro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales · ARInstitute of Population and Public Health · CASt George's, University of London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MRC/P027938/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed to address which antihypertensives are superior to placebo/no therapy or another antihypertensive for controlling nonsevere pregnancy hypertension and provide future sample size estimates for definitive evidence.

methodsRandomized trials of antihypertensives for nonsevere pregnancy hypertension were identified from online electronic databases, to February 28, 2021 (registration URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/; unique identifier: CRD42020188725). Our outcomes were severe hypertension, proteinuria/preeclampsia, fetal/newborn death, small-for-gestational age infants, preterm birth, and admission to neonatal care. A Bayesian random-effects model generated estimates of direct and indirect treatment comparisons. Trial sequential analysis informed future trials needed.

resultsOf 1246 publications identified, 72 trials were included; 61 (6923 women) were informative. All commonly prescribed antihypertensives (labetalol, other β-blockers, methyldopa, calcium channel blockers, and mixed/multi-drug therapy) versus placebo/no therapy reduced the risk of severe hypertension by 30% to 70%. Labetalol decreased proteinuria/preeclampsia (odds ratio, 0.73 [95% credible interval, 0.54-0.99]) and fetal/newborn death (odds ratio, 0.54 [0.30-0.98]) compared with placebo/no therapy, and proteinuria/preeclampsia compared with methyldopa (odds ratio, 0.66 [0.44-0.99]) and calcium channel blockers (odds ratio, 0.63 [0.41-0.96]). No other differences were identified, but credible intervals were wide. Trial sequential analysis indicated that 2500 to 10 000 women/arm (severe hypertension or safety outcomes) to >15 000/arm (fetal/newborn death) would be required to provide definitive evidence.

conclusionsIn summary, all commonly prescribed antihypertensives in pregnancy reduce the risk of severe hypertension, but labetalol may also decrease proteinuria/preeclampsia and fetal/newborn death. Evidence is lacking for many other safety outcomes. Prohibitive sample sizes are required for definitive evidence. Real-world data are needed to individualize care.

Indexed as

AdultAntihypertensive AgentsFemaleHumansHypertension, Pregnancy-InducedLabetalolPatient AcuityPregnancyTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive AgentsLabetalolblood pressuremorbiditynetwork meta-analysisproteinuriasample size

Identifiers

PMID35138877
PMCPMC8823910
OpenAlexW4205461822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.