ArticleNederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde2022
[Geriatric assessment to improve geriatric oncology].
Article in Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recent publication of the GAP70+ study in The Lancet is an important step in the field of geriatric oncology. This study shows that combining a geriatric assessment with oncologic and geriatric management recommendations has the potential to decrease toxicity. We discuss the implications of the study, performed in the United States, for clinical practice and future research in the Netherlands. The results of the GAP70+ study are promising, and the study has landmark potential. Although there are relevant differences in oncologic care between the Netherlands and the United states, this study provides new opportunities for expanding and improving geriatric oncology care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35138757What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.