Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35138646›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of educational psychology2022

Long-term labour market and economic consequences of school exclusions in England: Evidence from two counterfactual approaches.

Joan E Madia, Ingrid Obsuth, Ian Thompson, Harry Daniels, Aja L Murray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of educational psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joan E MadiaDepartment of Sociology, Nuffield College, University of Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8398-8859
Ingrid ObsuthClinical Psychology Department, University of Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1690-1092
Ian ThompsonDepartment of Education, University of Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6564-2635
Harry DanielsDepartment of Education, University of Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4523-0670
Aja L MurrayDepartment of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9068-3188

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council 1811EP001/LH7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious research suggests that school exclusion during childhood is a precursor to social exclusion in adulthood. Past literature on the consequences of school exclusion is, however, scarce and mainly focused on short-term outcomes such as educational attainment, delinquency, and mental health in early adolescence. Moreover, this evidence is based primarily on descriptive and correlational analysis, whereas robust causal evidence is required to best inform policy.

aimsWe aimed to estimate the mid-to-long-term impact of school exclusion on labour market and economic outcomes. SAMPLE: The sample included 6,632 young people who at the age of 25/26 in the year 2015 participated in the Next Steps survey of whom 86 were expelled from school and 711 were suspended between the ages of 13/14 and 16/17.

methodUsing high quality existing longitudinal data, we utilized four approaches to evaluate the impact of school exclusion: logistic regression-adjustment models, propensity score matching, school fixed-effects analysis, and inverse propensity weighting. The latter two counterfactual approaches were used to estimate causal effects.

resultsWe found that school exclusion increased the risk of becoming NEET at the age of 19/20, and then remaining economically inactive at the age of 25/26, as well as experiencing higher unemployment risk and earning lower wages also at the age of 25/26.

conclusionSchool exclusion has pervasive negative effects into adulthood. Policy interventions should focus on both prevention and mitigating its negative effects. Interventions aimed at re-integrating excluded individuals into education or vocational training could be key in reducing the risk of poor socio-economic outcomes and social exclusion.

Indexed as

SchoolsUnemploymentAdolescentAdultEducational StatusEnglandHumansMental Healthinverse probability treatment weightingNEETpropensity score analysisschool exclusionunemployment

Identifiers

PMID35138646
PMCPMC9546012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.