ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2022
Online exhaled propofol monitoring in normal-weight and obese surgical patients.
Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Propofol is in the air: can exhaled gas monitoring illuminate intravenous dosing?British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Developing a PK-PD model for propofol in exhaled air and the BIS following fospropofol disodium in beagles.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Validation of a method for estimating pulmonary dead space in ventilated beagles to correct exhaled propofol concentration in mixed air.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Exhaled propofol monitoring for plasma drug prediction in rats.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Effects of ketamine and propofol on muscarinic plateau potentials in rat neocortical pyramidal cells.PloS one · 2025Article
- Review
- Online exhaled propofol monitoring in normal-weight and obese surgical patients.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIon mobility spectrometry (IMS) allows for online quantification of exhaled propofol concentrations. We aimed to validate a bedside online IMS device, the Edmon
methodsPatients with body mass index (BMI) >20 kg/m
resultsA total of 29 patients (BMI 20.3-53.7) were included. A maximal R
conclusionsOnline monitoring of exhaled propofol concentrations is clinically feasible in normal-weight and obese patients. With a 5-min delay, our model outperforms the Marsh plasma TCI model in a post hoc analysis. Modest correlation with plasma concentrations makes the clinical usefulness questionable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.