Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35138631›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2022

Characterization of two new strains of Lactococcus lactis for their probiotic efficacy over commercial synbiotics consortia.

Biplab Bandyopadhyay, Satinath Das, Prashanta Kumar Mitra, Ashutosh Kundu, Vivekananda Mandal, Rajsekhar Adhikary, Vivekananda Mandal, Narayan Chandra Mandal

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Microbiology resource announcements · 2025
    Article
  7. Gut · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Characterization ofScience progress
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Biplab BandyopadhyayMycology and Plant Pathology Laboratory, Department of Botany, Siksha Bhavan, Visva-Bharati, Santiniketan, 731235, WB, India.
Satinath DasMycology and Plant Pathology Laboratory, Department of Botany, Siksha Bhavan, Visva-Bharati, Santiniketan, 731235, WB, India.
Prashanta Kumar MitraDepartment of Botany, University of Kalyani, Nadia, 741235, WB, India.
Ashutosh KunduPlant and Microbial Physiology and Biochemistry Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Gour Banga, Malda, 732103, WB, India.
Vivekananda MandalPlant and Microbial Physiology and Biochemistry Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Gour Banga, Malda, 732103, WB, India.
Rajsekhar AdhikaryPlant and Microbial Physiology and Biochemistry Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Gour Banga, Malda, 732103, WB, India.
Vivekananda MandalPlant and Microbial Physiology and Biochemistry Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Gour Banga, Malda, 732103, WB, India. vivek.bot@ugb.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6523-8069
Narayan Chandra MandalMycology and Plant Pathology Laboratory, Department of Botany, Siksha Bhavan, Visva-Bharati, Santiniketan, 731235, WB, India. mandalnc@rediffmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1631-0794
University of Gour Banga · INVisva-Bharati University · INUniversity of Kalyani · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactococcus spp. are industrially crucial lactic acid bacteria (LAB) used to manufacture lactic acid, pickled vegetables, buttermilk, cheese, and many kinds of delicious dairy foods and drinks. In addition to these, they are also being used as probiotics in specific formulations. However, their uses as probiotics are comparatively less than the other LAB genera. The present communication hypothesizes to validate the probiotic potentiality of two new Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis strains for their future uses. These native food fermenting strains were characterized for in vitro acid tolerance, tolerance to simulated gastric and pancreatic juices, autoaggregation and co-aggregation, hydrophobicity, haemolytic activity, bile salt deconjugation, cholesterol removal, antimicrobial spectrum, and antibiotic sensitivity. The in vivo live bacterial feeding of these strains for 30 days was done in Swiss albino mice either singly or in combination with prebiotic inulin and evaluated for hypocholesterolemic activity, immune enhancement, and gut colonization efficiency and compared with the commercial probiotic consortia. The study revealed that the strains could survive in human gut bile concentration, gastric pH conditions at pH 2.0, 3.0, and 8.0 for 6 h, had a broad antibacterial spectrum, and cholesterol binding efficacy. The strains could survive with higher colony-forming units (CFU/mL) when amended with sodium caseinate. The strains had autoaggregation ranges from 15 to 25% over 24 h and had a significant co-aggregation with both lactic acid and Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains related to human illness. The strains also showed solvent and media-specific hydrophobicity against n-hexane and xylene. The live bacterial feeding either singly or in combination with prebiotic inulin resulted in a significant reduction of LDL (low-density lipoprotein), VLDL (very low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol and triglyceride (TG), and a significant increase in HDL (high-density lipoprotein) cholesterol level, and improved gut colonization and gut immunomodulation. The results prove that these non-haemolytic, non-toxic strains had significant health benefits than the commercial probiotics consortium with the recommended prebiotics mix. Thus, these new Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis strains could be trialled as a new probiotic combination for human and animal feeds.

Indexed as

LactobacillalesLactococcus lactisProbioticsSynbioticsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaInulinLactic AcidLipoproteins, LDLMiceAnti-Bacterial AgentsInulinLactic AcidLipoproteins, LDLGut immunomodulationLactococcus lactis subsp. lactisNon-haemolyticProbiotic combinationSimulated gastric juice tolerance

Identifiers

PMID35138631
PMCPMC9151986
OpenAlexW4210859732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.