Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35138596›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2022

Socioeconomic position and consumption of sugary drinks, sugar-sweetened beverages and 100% juice among Canadians: a cross-sectional analysis of the 2015 Canadian Community Health Survey-Nutrition.

Christine Warren, Erin Hobin, Douglas G Manuel, Laura N Anderson, David Hammond, Mahsa Jessri, JoAnne Arcand, Mary L'Abbé, Ye Li, Laura C Rosella and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Christine WarrenPublic Health Ontario, 480 University Avenue, Suite 300, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V2, Canada.
Erin HobinPublic Health Ontario, 480 University Avenue, Suite 300, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V2, Canada.
Douglas G ManuelClinical Epidemiology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Laura N AndersonDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
David HammondSchool of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Mahsa JessriFood, Nutrition and Health Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
JoAnne ArcandFaculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, ON, Canada.
Mary L'AbbéDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ye LiPublic Health Ontario, 480 University Avenue, Suite 300, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V2, Canada.
Laura C RosellaDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Heather MansonDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Brendan T SmithPublic Health Ontario, 480 University Avenue, Suite 300, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V2, Canada. brendan.smith@oahpp.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-2785-1246

Funding

CIHR 391602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to describe sugary drink (beverages with free sugars), sugar-sweetened beverage (beverages with added sugars, SSB) and 100% juice (beverages with natural sugars) consumption across socioeconomic position (SEP) among Canadians.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 19,742 respondents of single-day 24-h dietary recalls in the nationally representative 2015 Canadian Community Health Survey-Nutrition. Poisson regressions were used to estimate the prevalence of consuming each beverage type on a given day. Among consumers on a given day, linear regressions were used to estimate mean energy intake. Models included household education, food security and income quintiles as separate unadjusted exposures. Sex-specific models were estimated separately for children/adolescents (2-18 years) and adults (19 +).

resultsAmong female children/adolescents, the prevalence of consuming sugary drinks and, separately, SSB ranged from 11 to 21 and 8 to 27 percentage-points higher among lower education compared to 'Bachelor degree or above' households. In female adults, the prevalence of consuming sugary drinks and, separately, SSB was 10 (95% CI: 1, 19) and 14 (95% CI: 2, 27) percentage-points higher in food insecure compared to secure households. In males, the prevalence of consuming 100% juice was 9 (95% CI: - 18, 0) percentage-points lower among food insecure compared to secure households. Social inequities in energy intake were observed in female adult consumers, among whom mean energy from sugary drinks was 27 kcal (95% CI: 3, 51) higher among food insecure compared to secure and 35 kcal (95% CI: 2, 67) higher from 100% juice among 'less than high school' education compared to 'Bachelor degree or above' households.

conclusionSocial inequities in sugary drink consumption exist in Canada. The associations differed by SEP indicator. Equitable interventions to reduce consumption are warranted.

Indexed as

Sugar-Sweetened BeveragesAdolescentAdultCanadaChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePublic HealthSocioeconomic FactorsSugarsSugars100% juice2015 Canadian Community Health Survey–NutritionSocial inequitiesSocioeconomic positionSugar-containing beveragesSugar-sweetened beveragesSugary drinks

Identifiers

PMID35138596
PMCPMC9043056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.