Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35138585›Full record

ArticleCurrent topics in behavioral neurosciences2022

Effects of Setting on Psychedelic Experiences, Therapies, and Outcomes: A Rapid Scoping Review of the Literature.

Tasha L Golden, Susan Magsamen, Clara C Sandu, Shuyang Lin, Grace Marie Roebuck, Kathy M Shi, Frederick S Barrett

Registry-linked trialAbstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07180108 (PRoMiSS), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07180108 phase1enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

PRoMiSS: Psilocybin and the Role of Music in Set and Setting

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2025 to 2028Enrolled100ConditionsPsilocybin, Music InterventionArmsPsilocybin (high dose), Playlist 1, Playlist 2, Playlist 3, Playlist 4
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Decreased COCommunications psychology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tasha L GoldenInternational Arts + Mind Lab, Center for Applied Neuroaesthetics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. tasha.golden@artsandmindlab.org.
Susan MagsamenInternational Arts + Mind Lab, Center for Applied Neuroaesthetics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Clara C SanduInternational Arts + Mind Lab, Center for Applied Neuroaesthetics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Shuyang LinInternational Arts + Mind Lab, Center for Applied Neuroaesthetics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Grace Marie RoebuckInternational Arts + Mind Lab, Center for Applied Neuroaesthetics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kathy M ShiDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Psychedelic and Consciousness Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Frederick S BarrettDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Psychedelic and Consciousness Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. fbarrett@jhmi.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The health and well-being impacts of art and aesthetic experiences have been rigorously studied by a range of disciplines, including cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry, public health, and translational clinical research. These experiences, encompassed in the concepts of set and setting, have long been claimed to be pivotal in determining the acute and enduring effects of psychedelic experiences. Responding to the field's longstanding emphasis on the role and value of setting, a rapid scoping review was undertaken to identify the extent to which effects of setting and aesthetics on psychedelic experiences and therapies have been explicitly studied. It offers an analysis of the strengths and limitations of the extant literature and discusses evidentiary gaps as well as evidentiary opportunities for the field. The 43 included studies indicate apparent consensus regarding the importance of setting in psychedelic therapies, as well as consistent interest in theorizing about these effects. However, this consensus has yet to generate consistent, prospective, rigorous tests of setting and its complexities. As a result, the field continues to lack understanding or agreement regarding the effects of various specific elements of setting, the mechanisms by which they affect outcomes, for whom these effects occur, under what circumstances, given what conditions, and other critical factors. Further studies of setting and aesthetics in the context of psychedelic therapies are likely to not only improve these therapies and their delivery, but also inform considerations of setting and aesthetics for non-psychedelic interventions.

Indexed as

HallucinogensPsychiatryProspective StudiesHallucinogensAestheticsArtsArts and healthCeremonial settingClassic psychedelicsEnriched environmentMusicNaturalistic settingNeuroaestheticsPlant based medicinePsychedelicsPsychedelic therapyRitual settingScoping reviewSettingSociocultural setting

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.