Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35138584›Full record

ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2023

Effects of Dietary Supplementation with Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bacillus subtilis on Mucosal Immunity and Intestinal Barrier Are Associated with Its Modulation of Gut Metabolites and Microbiota in Late-Phase Laying Hens.

Xin Chen, Weiwen Chen, Wenjia Ci, Yingying Zheng, Xinyan Han, Jianping Huang, Jianjin Zhu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Effects ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  13. The active roles ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Oral supplementation withFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  17. Effects of dietary supplementation withFrontiers in nutrition · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Heat-KilledAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  20. Microorganisms · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xin ChenCentre for Food Nutrition and Functional Food Engineering, School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Jiangsu, 214122, China.
Weiwen ChenCentre for Food Nutrition and Functional Food Engineering, School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Jiangsu, 214122, China.
Wenjia CiCentre for Food Nutrition and Functional Food Engineering, School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Jiangsu, 214122, China.
Yingying ZhengCentre for Food Nutrition and Functional Food Engineering, School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Jiangsu, 214122, China.
Xinyan HanKey Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in East China, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Jianping HuangFood Processing Technology Laboratory, School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Jiangsu, 214122, China.
Jianjin ZhuCentre for Food Nutrition and Functional Food Engineering, School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Jiangsu, 214122, China. 13706191551@163.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3592-1726
Jiangnan University · CNMinistry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the effects of dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bacillus subtilis on the intestinal immune response, intestinal barrier function, cecal microbiota profile, and metabolite profile in late-phase laying hens. Hens were divided into three groups and fed with the basal diet (NC group), basal diet supplementation with 250 mg/kg B. subtilis and L. acidophilus mixture powder (LD group), and basal diet supplementation with 500 mg/kg B. subtilis and L. acidophilus mixture powder (HD group), respectively. The results indicated that the dietary supplementation with L. acidophilus and B. subtilis increased the integrity of the intestinal barrier as evidenced by the significant increase in the number of ileal goblet cells and improve the expression of occludin, claudin-1, and ZO-1 genes in the HD group. Moreover, the levels of IL-6, TNF-α, and IFN-γ were significantly decreased in the LD and HD groups. The levels of immunoglobulin G (IgG) increased in the LD and HD group, and the levels of secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) increased with the HD treatment. Furthermore, 16 s rRNA sequencing revealed L. acidophilus in combination with B. subtilis increased the diversity of gut microbiota. The metabolomic analysis revealed beneficial changes in the amino acid metabolism and lipid metabolism (decrease in LysoPC and LysoPE levels). In conclusion, dietary supplementation with L. acidophilus and B. subtilis could improve intestinal barrier function and maintain immune homeostasis. These beneficial effects may be associated with the modulation of the intestinal microbiome and metabolites.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeProbioticsAnimal FeedAnimalsBacillus subtilisChickensDietDietary SupplementsFemaleImmunity, MucosalLactobacillus acidophilusPowdersPowdersImmune responsesIntestinal barrierLate-phase laying hensMetabolomicsMicrobiotaProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID35138584
OpenAlexW4210912182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.