Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35138581›Full record

ArticleInfection2022

Sex differences in COVID-19 mortality in the Netherlands.

Annabel Niessen, Anne C Teirlinck, Scott A McDonald, Wim van der Hoek, Rianne van Gageldonk-Lafeber, RIVM COVID-19 epidemiology, surveillance group, Mirjam J Knol

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Annabel NiessenRijksinstituut Voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (National Institute for Public Health and Environment, RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands. annabel.niessen@rivm.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6586-9776
Anne C TeirlinckRijksinstituut Voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (National Institute for Public Health and Environment, RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1172-8975
Scott A McDonaldRijksinstituut Voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (National Institute for Public Health and Environment, RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Wim van der HoekRijksinstituut Voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (National Institute for Public Health and Environment, RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Rianne van Gageldonk-LafeberRijksinstituut Voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (National Institute for Public Health and Environment, RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
RIVM COVID-19 epidemiology, surveillance group
Mirjam J KnolRijksinstituut Voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (National Institute for Public Health and Environment, RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment · NLHealth Forecasting · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSince the first reports of COVID-19 cases, sex-discrepancies have been reported in COVID-19 mortality. We provide a detailed description of these sex differences in relation to age and comorbidities among notified cases as well as in relation to age and sex-specific mortality in the general Dutch population.

methodsData on COVID-19 cases and mortality until May 31st 2020 was extracted from the national surveillance database with exclusion of healthcare workers. Association between sex and case fatality was analyzed with multivariable logistic regression. Subsequently, male-female ratio in standardized mortality ratios and population mortality rates relative to all-cause and infectious disease-specific mortality were computed stratified by age.

resultsMale-female odds ratio for case fatality was 1.33 [95% CI 1.26-1.41] and among hospitalized cases 1.27 [95% CI 1.16-1.40]. This remained significant after adjustment for age and comorbidities. The male-female ratio of the standardized mortality ratio was 1.70 [95%CI 1.62-1.78]. The population mortality rate for COVID-19 was 35.1 per 100.000, with a male-female rate ratio of 1.25 (95% CI 1.18-1.31) which was higher than in all-cause population mortality and infectious disease mortality.

conclusionOur study confirms male sex is a predisposing factor for severe outcomes of COVID-19, independent of age and comorbidities. In addition to general male-female-differences, COVID-19 specific mechanisms likely contribute to this mortality discrepancy.

Indexed as

COVID-19FemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleNetherlandsSARS-CoV-2Sex CharacteristicsCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2Sex-differences

Identifiers

PMID35138581
PMCPMC9151564
OpenAlexW4210916316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.