Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35138520›Full record

ReviewPituitary2022

Functioning gonadotroph adenomas in premenopausal women: clinical and molecular characterization and review of the literature.

Linjie Wang, Hanting Liang, Chengyan Deng, Qi Yu, Fengying Gong, Feng Feng, Hui You, Zhiyong Liang, Bo Chen, Kan Deng and 4 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pituitary, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Linjie Wang *Department of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology of National Health Commission, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, 1# Shuai Fu Yuan, Dong Dan, Beijing, 100730, China.
Hanting Liang *Department of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology of National Health Commission, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, 1# Shuai Fu Yuan, Dong Dan, Beijing, 100730, China.
Chengyan DengReproductive Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Qi YuReproductive Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Fengying GongDepartment of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology of National Health Commission, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, 1# Shuai Fu Yuan, Dong Dan, Beijing, 100730, China.
Feng FengDepartment of Radiology, Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, PekingBeijing, China.
Hui YouDepartment of Radiology, Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, PekingBeijing, China.
Zhiyong LiangDepartment of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Bo ChenDepartment of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Kan DengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jin MaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, 1# Shuai Fu Yuan, Dong Dan, Beijing, 100730, China.
Renzhi WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Yong YaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. freetigeryao@163.com.
Huijuan ZhuDepartment of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology of National Health Commission, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, 1# Shuai Fu Yuan, Dong Dan, Beijing, 100730, China. shengxin2004@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5172-6870
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Science 2016-I2M-1-002Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Science 2017-I2M-1-011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo summary the clinical features of premenopausal women with functioning gonadotroph adenomas (FGAs) and preliminarily explore their molecular characterization.

methods12 premenopausal females with FGAs in our center were retrospectively analyzed. Previously reported cases were also summarized. The patients were clinically divided into FSH- or LH-predominant types according to their preoperative serum FSH/LH ratio. The expressions of related genes in the tumor tissues of female FGAs, non-functioning gonadotroph adenomas (NFGAs), and silent corticotropin adenomas were evaluated by RT-qPCR.

resultsOf all the 12 patients with FGAs from our center, 11 (91.7%) were diagnosed as FSH-predominant type, and they all had menstrual disorders, including 9 with spontaneous ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (sOHSS). Their hormonal profiles showed non-suppressed FSH (12.45 ± 7.34 IU/L) with hyperestrogenemia [median estradiol level 1353.0 pg/mL (636.0, 3535.0)]. The other patient (8.3%) with LH-predominant type mainly manifested with infertility and sustained elevated serum LH without FSH or estradiol increasing. 65 premenopausal FGAs patients were systematic reviewed. 60 patients (92.3%) were FSH-predominant type, including 86.7% presented with menstrual disorders, 16.7% reported infertility, and 98.2% (55/56) showed sOHSS. No sOHSS or hyperestrogenemia were found in the 5 patients (7.7%) with LH-predominant type. Pituitary imaging data revealed macroadenomas and microadenomas accounted for 89.2% and 10.8%, respectively. Of 63 patients (96.9%) who underwent pituitary adenoma resection, 77.8% had complete tumor resection and no recurrence at the last follow-up. The relative expressions of KISS1 mRNA were significantly higher in FGA group than in NFGA group (p = 0.018), and significantly positively correlated with the preoperative serum estradiol levels (p = 0.004).

conclusionsDifferent clinical features were observed in premenopausal women with FGAs of FSH- or LH-predominant types. The elevated KISS1 expression in tumor tissues might involve in the secretion function of FGAs.

Indexed as

AdenomaGonadotrophsInfertilityPituitary NeoplasmsEstradiolFemaleFollicle Stimulating HormoneHumansKisspeptinsLuteinizing HormoneRetrospective StudiesEstradiolFollicle Stimulating HormoneKisspeptinsLuteinizing HormoneFunctioning gonadotroph adenomasKISS1KISS1RPremenopausal women

Identifiers

PMID35138520
OpenAlexW4210823514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.