ReviewDer Internist2022
[Telemedicine in chronic heart failure-From clinical studies to standard care].
Review in Der Internist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Narrative Review: Advancements in Heart Failure Diagnosis and Management using Artificial Intelligence: A New Era of Patient Care.Current cardiology reviews · 2026Review
- [Telemedicine in chronic heart failure].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- The present and future of cardiological telemonitoring in Europe: a statement from seven European countries.Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2025Review
- Telemonitoring for Chronic Heart Failure: Narrative Review of the 20-Year Journey From Concept to Standard Care in Germany.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Review
- Article
- E-Health-based, trans-sectoral, geriatric health service - Geriatric Network (GerNe).Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telemedicine has the potential to solve many current and especially future challenges in medical care. Using the example of heart failure (HF), the transition of telemedicine from clinical studies to standard care is presented. In patients with chronic HF, randomized controlled trials have shown that telemedicine-based care leads to a reduction in mortality and cardiovascular morbidity. Based on these data, the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) decided that for the first time a digital method should be introduced into standard care for high-risk patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. In the future, this group of patients will be entitled to telemedical care using active rhythm devices or noninvasive measuring devices. The indications are assessed by the primary treating physician (PBA), who works together with a telemedicine center (TMZ) managed through cardiology that receives daily telemetric data and notifies the PBA of abnormal findings. Alternatively, a cardiologist PBA with an associated TMZ infrastructure can also provide telemedical care. In the future, advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence or mobile communication standard 5G will help to make telemedicine both widely available and usable for alternative sensor technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.