Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35138423›Full record

SynthesisAesthetic plastic surgery2022

Incidence of Complications for Different Approaches in Gynecomastia Correction: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Alessandro Innocenti, Dario Melita, Emanuela Dreassi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Gynecomastia Surgery: Liposuction Alone versus Liposuction with Endoscope-Assisted Glandular Excision-A Comparative Study.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Multidisciplinary Team Care: Adolescent Breast.Seminars in plastic surgery · 2025
    Review
  13. Long-Term Outcome of Surgery for Grade 4 Gynecomastia: A Single-Center Experience.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The GLAND-IQ Technique for Surgical Correction of Moderate to Severe Gynecomastia.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alessandro InnocentiPlastic and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Palagi 1, 50127, Florence, Italy. a.innocenti@unifi.it.ORCID 0000-0002-6959-4455
Dario MelitaPlastic and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Palagi 1, 50127, Florence, Italy.
Emanuela DreassiDepartment of Statistica, Informatica, Applicazioni (DiSIA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGynecomastia is nowadays a very common disease, affecting a large cohort of patients with different ages. The aim of this literature review is to assess the incidence of complications with all proposed techniques and for combined procedures versus single approach procedures in gynecomastia correction. MATERIALS AND

methodsA systematic review of the literature was performed to identify all reported techniques for gynecomastia correction covering a period from January 1, 1987 to November 1, 2020. For all selected papers, demographic data, proposed technique, and complications' incidence have been recorded.

resultsA total number of 3970 results was obtained from database analysis. A final total number of 94 articles was obtained for 7294 patients analyzed. Patients have been divided into three groups: aspiration techniques, consisting in 874 patients (11,98%), surgical excision techniques, consisting in 2764 patients (37,90%), and combined techniques, consisting in 3656 patients (50,12%). Complications have been recorded for all groups, for a total number of 1407, of which 130 among "Aspiration techniques" group (14,87%), 847 among "Surgical excision techniques" group (30,64%), and 430 in "Combined techniques" group (11,76%).

conclusionsSeveral techniques have been proposed in the literature to address gynecomastia, with the potential to greatly improve self-confidence and overall appearance of affected patients. The combined use of surgical excision and aspiration techniques seems to reduce the rate of complications compared to surgical excision alone, but the lack of unique classification and the presence of several surgical techniques still represents a bias in the literature review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

GynecomastiaCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualEstheticsHumansIncidenceMaleRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeGynecomastiaGynecomastia reviewLiposuctionLiterature analysisSurgical gland excision

Identifiers

PMID35138423
PMCPMC9411245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.