Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35138140›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2022

Differential Growth Rates and

A Cassiopeia Russell, Dennis E Kyle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Virulence ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Secreted small RNAs ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Characterization ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The Pathology of the Brain Eating AmoebaIndian journal of microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Transcriptomic profiling of "brain-eating amoeba"Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A Cassiopeia RussellCenter for Tropical and Emerging Global Diseases, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Dennis E KyleCenter for Tropical and Emerging Global Diseases, Athens, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0238-965X
University of Georgia · US

Funding

Training in Tropical and Emerging Global Diseases - SupplementT32AI060546 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA (UGA) · PI Silvia N Moreno, Vasant Muralidharan · 2004 to 2026
$5.1M
Repurposing drugs for treatment of primary amoebic meningoencephalitisR03AI149097 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI KYLE, DENNIS E · 2020 to 2021
$151k
NIAID NIH HHS R03 AI149097NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI060546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The free-living amoeba Naegleria fowleri, which typically dwells within warm, freshwater environments, can opportunistically cause primary amoebic meningoencephalitis (PAM), a disease with a mortality rate of >97%. The lack of positive treatment outcomes for PAM has prompted the discovery and development of more effective therapeutics, yet most studies utilize only one or two clinical isolates. The inability to assess possible heterogenic responses to drugs among isolates from various geographical regions hinders progress in the discovery of more effective drugs. Here, we conducted drug efficacy and growth rate determinations for 11 different clinical isolates by applying a previously developed CellTiter-Glo 2.0 screening technique and flow cytometry. We found significant differences in the susceptibilities of these isolates to 7 of 8 drugs tested, all of which make up the cocktail that is recommended to physicians by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We also discovered significant variances in growth rates among isolates, which draws attention to the differences among the amoeba isolates collected from different patients. Our results demonstrate the need for additional clinical isolates of various genotypes in drug assays and highlight the necessity for more targeted therapeutics with universal efficacy across N. fowleri isolates. Our data establish a needed baseline for drug susceptibility among clinical isolates and provide a segue for future combination therapy studies as well as research related to phenotypic or genetic differences that could shed light on mechanisms of action or predispositions to specific drugs.

Indexed as

Pharmaceutical PreparationsAntiprotozoal AgentsCentral Nervous System Protozoal InfectionsDrug DiscoveryGenotypeHumansInhibitory Concentration 50Naegleria fowleriAntiprotozoal AgentsPharmaceutical Preparationsdrug discoverygenotypeNaegleria fowleri

Identifiers

PMID35138140
PMCPMC8826828
OpenAlexW4220883702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.