Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35138012›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2022

Multimodal biological brain age prediction using magnetic resonance imaging and angiography with the identification of predictive regions.

Pauline Mouches, Matthias Wilms, Deepthi Rajashekar, Sönke Langner, Nils D Forkert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Regional brain aging patterns reveal disease-specific pathways of neurodegeneration.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Second-order instantaneous causal analysis of spontaneous MEG.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Geroscience-Centric Perspective for Geriatric Psychiatry: Integrating Aging Biology With Geriatric Mental Health Research.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. A deep neural network estimation of brain age is sensitive to cognitive impairment and decline.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pauline MouchesDepartment of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0304-5584
Matthias WilmsDepartment of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8845-360X
Deepthi RajashekarDepartment of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2009-764X
Sönke LangnerInstitute for Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany.
Nils D ForkertDepartment of Radiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2556-3224
University of Calgary · CAUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological brain age predicted using machine learning models based on high-resolution imaging data has been suggested as a potential biomarker for neurological and cerebrovascular diseases. In this work, we aimed to develop deep learning models to predict the biological brain age using structural magnetic resonance imaging and angiography datasets from a large database of 2074 adults (21-81 years). Since different imaging modalities can provide complementary information, combining them might allow to identify more complex aging patterns, with angiography data, for instance, showing vascular aging effects complementary to the atrophic brain tissue changes seen in T1-weighted MRI sequences. We used saliency maps to investigate the contribution of cortical, subcortical, and arterial structures to the prediction. Our results show that combining T1-weighted and angiography MR data led to a significantly improved brain age prediction accuracy, with a mean absolute error of 3.85 years comparing the predicted and chronological age. The most predictive brain regions included the lateral sulcus, the fourth ventricle, and the amygdala, while the brain arteries contributing the most to the prediction included the basilar artery, the middle cerebral artery M2 segments, and the left posterior cerebral artery. Our study proposes a framework for brain age prediction using multimodal imaging, which gives accurate predictions and allows identifying the most predictive regions for this task, which can serve as a surrogate for the brain regions that are most affected by aging.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingAngiographyChild, PreschoolHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMiddle AgedYoung Adultbrain agingdeep learningmagnetic resonance angiographymagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID35138012
PMCPMC9057090
OpenAlexW4210858825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.