Observational studyCoDAS2022
Analysis of an outpatient child hearing health program: from screening to referral for rehabilitation.
Observational study in CoDAS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Barriers and Limitations in Neonatal Hearing and Vision Screening in Latin America: A Scoping Review.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo analyze the stages of a hearing health program, from screening to referral for rehabilitation, based on the quality indicators for neonatal screening programs.
methodsThis is a cohort, observational, retrospective study encompassing all newborns included in the Municipal Information System of Mogi Mirim, São Paulo, from 2010 to 2016. Besides the data present in the Information System on Live Newborns, the newborn's age at the first test, test and diagnosis results, and referrals for rehabilitation were analyzed, based on the quality indicator criteria recommended by the Neonatal Hearing Screening Care Guidelines, with a statistical program.
resultsA total of 7,800 newborns participated. The following results were obtained in the analysis of the program quality indicators: 1) Neonatal hearing screening stage: 97% coverage in the first test; 91% of newborns by 30 days old; 2) Diagnosis stage: 0.24% referred after failing the second test; 94.73% adherence; 13.66% confirmed diagnosis by 3 months old; 3) Rehabilitation stage: 100% began speech-language-hearing therapy immediately after the diagnosis; 20% received the hearing aid within 1 month from diagnosis.
conclusionThe program, conducted in an outpatient setting, met the recommendations of the guidelines presented by the Ministry of Health concerning the coverage and age at first examination, age at screening up to 1 month old, referral for diagnosis, and beginning the intervention. These results were obtained thanks to institutional support from the municipality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.