Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35137873›Full record

ArticleJornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia2022

Incidental findings on lung cancer screening: pictorial essay and systematic checklist.

Diana Penha, Erique Pinto, Colin Monaghan, Bruno Hochhegger, Edson Marchiori, Luís Taborda-Barata, Klaus Irion, Sofia Ravara, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. ERS/ESTS/ESTRO/ESR/ESTI/EFOMP statement on management of incidental findings from low dose CT screening for lung cancer.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Diana Penha. Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3358-6875
Erique Pinto. Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6648-9270
Colin Monaghan. Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5300-0229
Bruno Hochhegger. Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-1984-4636
Edson Marchiori. Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro (RJ) Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-8797-7380
Luís Taborda-Barata. Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6649-8890
Klaus Irion. Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7860-7879
Sofia Ravara. Centro de Investigação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade da Beira Interior - CICS-UBI - Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2116-6670
Hans-Ulrich Kauczor. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6730-9462

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer screening (LCS) programs are increasing worldwide. Incidental findings (IFs) on LCS are defined as low-dose CT findings unrelated to the primary purpose of identifying lung cancer. Most IFs on LCS are benign and clinically insignificant but are being increasingly recognized, and some require urgent referral for further diagnostic workup. Other findings are expected and are known as smoking-related comorbidities, including COPD, cardiovascular disease, emphysema, and interstitial lung disease, and their diagnosis can have a significant impact on patient prognosis. The purpose of this pictorial essay is to illustrate the most common IFs on LCS, organized by organ. We will discuss the current literature on IFs on LCS, focusing on their prevalence, appropriate communication, and triggering of clinical pathway systems.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerLung NeoplasmsChecklistHumansIncidental FindingsMass ScreeningTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID35137873
PMCPMC8836644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.