Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35137613›Full record

ArticleMultiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)2022

Productivity loss among people with early multiple sclerosis: A Canadian study.

Elisabet Rodriguez Llorian, Wei Zhang, Amir Khakban, Scott Patten, Anthony Traboulsee, Jiwon Oh, Shannon Kolind, Alexandre Prat, Roger Tam, Larry D Lynd

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Societal, occupational, and economic considerations for women with (M)INOCA: a narrative review.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabet Rodriguez LlorianCollaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3207-8916
Wei ZhangSchool of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada/Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences (CHÉOS), St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Amir KhakbanCollaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Scott PattenDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Anthony TraboulseeDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jiwon OhDivision of Neurology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Shannon KolindDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Alexandre PratDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Roger TamDepartment of Radiology and School of Biomedical Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Larry D LyndCollaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada/Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences (CHÉOS), St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo analyze work productivity loss and costs, including absenteeism (time missed from work), presenteeism (reduced productivity while working), and unpaid work loss, among a sample of employed people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) in Canada, as well as its association with clinical, sociodemographic, and work-related factors.

methodsWe used cross-sectional data collected as part of the Canadian Prospective Cohort Study to Understand Progression in MS (CanProCo) and information from the Valuation of Lost Productivity questionnaire.

resultsAmong 512 pwMS who were employed, 97% showed no or mild disability and 55% experienced productivity loss due to MS in the prior 3 months. Total productivity time loss over a 3-month period averaged 60 hours (SD = 107; 23 from presenteeism, 19 from absenteeism, and 18 from unpaid work), leading to a mean cost of lost productivity of CAD$2480 (SD = 4282) per patient, with an hourly paid productivity loss greater than the wage loss. Fatigue retained significant associations with all productivity loss outcomes.

conclusionUnpaid work loss and productivity losses exceeding those of the employee alone (due to teamwork and associated factors) are key additional contributors of the high economic burden of MS. Workplace accommodations and treatments targeted at fatigue could lessen the economic impact of MS.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesFatigueHumansProspective StudiesfatigueMultiple sclerosisunpaid productivity losswork productivity loss

Identifiers

PMID35137613
PMCPMC9260491
OpenAlexW4210827259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.