Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35137549›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science2022

Decision neuroscience and neuroeconomics: Recent progress and ongoing challenges.

Jeffrey B Dennison, Daniel Sazhin, David V Smith

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Scammers' Psychological Warfare: A Call to Arms.Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Neural Support for Contributions of Utility and Narrative Processing of Evidence in Juror Decision Making.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jeffrey B DennisonDepartment of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0557-3548
Daniel SazhinDepartment of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
David V SmithDepartment of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5754-9633

Funding

Social Reward Processing Across the Lifespan: Identifying Risk Factors for Financial ExploitationRF1AG067011 · NIA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI SMITH, DAVID VICTOR · 2021 to 2021
$2.0M
Remote Modulation of Reward Circuits with Noninvasive Brain StimulationR21MH113917 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI SMITH, DAVID VICTOR · 2017 to 2018
$422k
Aberrant Reward Sensitivity: Mechanisms Underlying Substance UseR03DA046733 · NIDA · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI SMITH, DAVID VICTOR · 2019 to 2019
$229k
NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG067011NIA NIH HHS RF1-AG067011NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA046733NIDA NIH HHS R03-DA046733NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH113917NIMH NIH HHS R21-MH113917
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past decade, decision neuroscience and neuroeconomics have developed many new insights in the study of decision making. This review provides an overarching update on how the field has advanced in this time period. Although our initial review a decade ago outlined several theoretical, conceptual, methodological, empirical, and practical challenges, there has only been limited progress in resolving these challenges. We summarize significant trends in decision neuroscience through the lens of the challenges outlined for the field and review examples where the field has had significant, direct, and applicable impacts across economics and psychology. First, we review progress on topics including reward learning, explore-exploit decisions, risk and ambiguity, intertemporal choice, and valuation. Next, we assess the impacts of emotion, social rewards, and social context on decision making. Then, we follow up with how individual differences impact choices and new exciting developments in the prediction and neuroforecasting of future decisions. Finally, we consider how trends in decision-neuroscience research reflect progress toward resolving past challenges, discuss new and exciting applications of recent research, and identify new challenges for the field. This article is categorized under: Psychology > Reasoning and Decision Making Psychology > Emotion and Motivation.

Indexed as

Decision MakingNeurosciencesEmotionsHumansMotivationRewardchoicedecision neuroscienceeconomicsneuroimagingnoninvasive brain stimulation

Identifiers

PMID35137549
PMCPMC9124684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.