Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35137537›Full record

ArticleESC heart failure2022

The use of angiotensin II receptor blocker is associated with greater recovery of cardiac function than angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in dilated cardiomyopathy.

Nobuyuki Enzan, Shouji Matsushima, Tomomi Ide, Takeshi Tohyama, Kouta Funakoshi, Taiki Higo, Hiroyuki Tsutsui

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESC heart failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nobuyuki EnzanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Maidashi 3-1-1, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Shouji MatsushimaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Maidashi 3-1-1, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Tomomi IdeDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Maidashi 3-1-1, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Takeshi TohyamaCenter for Clinical and Translational Research, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kouta FunakoshiCenter for Clinical and Translational Research, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Taiki HigoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Hospital Organization, Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hiroyuki TsutsuiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Maidashi 3-1-1, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Kyushu University · JPKyushu University Hospital · JPNational Kyushu Medical Center · JP

Funding

Wellcome Trust FC001051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAngiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) have been shown to be associated with recovery of cardiac function in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). The aim of this study was to assess comparative effectiveness of ACEis vs. ARBs on recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) among patients with DCM. METHODS AND

resultsWe analysed the clinical personal records of DCM, a national database of the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, from 2003 to 2014. Patients with LVEF < 40% and on either ACEis or ARBs were included. Eligible patients were divided into two groups according to the use of ACEis or ARBs. A one-to-one propensity case-matched analysis was used. The primary outcome was defined as LVEF ≥ 40% at 3 years of follow-up. Out of 4618 eligible patients, 2238 patients received ACEis and 2380 patients received ARBs. Propensity score matching yielded 1341 pairs. Mean age was 56.0 years, 2041 (76.1%) were male, median duration of heart failure was 1 year, and mean LVEF was 27.6%. The primary outcome was observed more frequently in ARB group than in ACEi group (59.8% vs. 54.1%; odds ratio 1.26; 95% confidence interval 1.08-1.47; P = 0.003). The per-protocol analysis showed similar results (62.0% vs. 54.0%; odds ratio 1.39; 95% confidence interval 1.17-1.66; P < 0.001). The change in LVEF from baseline to 3 years of follow-up was greater in ARB group than in ACEi group (15.8 ± 0.4% vs. 14.0 ± 0.4%, P = 0.003). The subgroup analysis showed that this effect was observed independently of systolic blood pressure, heart rate, LVEF, chronic kidney disease, and concomitant use of beta-blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists.

conclusionsThe use of ARBs was associated with LVEF recovery more frequently than ACEis among patients with DCM and reduced LVEF.

Indexed as

Angiotensin Receptor AntagonistsCardiomyopathy, DilatedAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAngiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitorAngiotensin II receptor blockerDilated cardiomyopathyHeart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Identifiers

PMID35137537
PMCPMC8934926
OpenAlexW4210837814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.