Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35137528›Full record

ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2022

Immediate birth for women between 34 and 37 weeks of gestation with prolonged preterm prelabour rupture of membranes and detection of vaginal or urine group B streptococcus: an economic evaluation.

Jeremy Dietz, Jane Plumb, Philip Banfield, Aung Soe, Fadi Chehadah, Stacey Chang-Douglass, Gabriel Rogers

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jeremy DietzCentre for Guidelines, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), London, UK.
Jane PlumbGroup B Strep Support, Haywards Heath, West Sussex, UK.
Philip BanfieldGlan Clwyd Hospital, Bodelwyddan, Rhyl, UK.
Aung SoeOliver Fisher Neonatal Unit, Medway Maritime Hospital, Gillingham, Kent, UK.
Fadi ChehadahCentre for Guidelines, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Manchester, UK.
Stacey Chang-DouglassCentre for Guidelines, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), London, UK.
Gabriel RogersDivision of Population Health, Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence · GBGlan Clwyd Hospital · GBHaywards Heath Hospital · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBMedway Maritime Hospital · GB

Funding

This research was conducted as part of a guideline update commissioned by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). JD is an employee of NICE. GR, FC and SCD were employees of NICE at the time that this work was conducted.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWhat are the costs, benefits and harms of immediate birth compared with expectant management in women with prolonged preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM) at 34

designMathematical decision model comprising three independent decision trees.

settingUK National Health Service (NHS) and personal social services perspective. POPULATION: Women testing positive for GBS with PPROM at 34

methodsThe model estimates lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) using evidence from randomised trials, UK NHS data sources and further observational studies. Simulated events include neonatal infections, morbidity associated with preterm birth and consequences of caesarean birth. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSAs) were performed.

main outcome measuresQALYs, costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

resultsIn this population, immediate birth dominates expectant management: it is more effective (average lifetime QALYs, 24.705 versus 24.371) and it is cheaper (average lifetime costs, £14,372 versus £19,311). In one-way sensitivity analysis, results are robust to all but the odds ratio estimating the relative effect on incidence of infections. Threshold analysis shows that the odds of infection only need to be >1.5% with expectant management for the benefit of avoiding infections to outweigh the disadvantages of immediate birth. In PSA, immediate birth is the preferred option in >80% of simulations.

conclusionsNeonatal GBS infections are expensive to treat and may result in substantial adverse health consequences. Therefore, immediate birth, which is associated with a reduced risk of neonatal infection compared with expectant management, is expected to generate better health outcomes and decreased lifetime costs. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: For women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes and group B streptococcus in vaginal or urine samples, immediate birth is associated with improved health in their babies and reduced costs, compared with expectant management.

Indexed as

Premature BirthPremature Rupture of Fetal MembranesCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyState MedicineStreptococcus agalactiaeTerm Birthantibioticscaesarean deliveryeconomics of health caregroup B streptococcushealth economistsinfectionneonatalpaediatrics

Identifiers

PMID35137528
PMCPMC9543209
OpenAlexW4211234241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.