Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35137480›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cancer care2022

Towards identifying cancer patients at risk to miss out on psycho-oncological treatment via machine learning.

Moritz Philipp Günther, Johannes Kirchebner, Jan Ben Schulze, Roland von Känel, Sebastian Euler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cancer care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Experience in psychological counseling supported by artificial intelligence technology.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Moritz Philipp GüntherDepartment of Consultation-Liaison-Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7707-5532
Johannes KirchebnerDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6072-9958
Jan Ben SchulzeDepartment of Consultation-Liaison-Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5252-3976
Roland von KänelDepartment of Consultation-Liaison-Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8929-5129
Sebastian EulerDepartment of Consultation-Liaison-Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5009-8355

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn routine oncological treatment settings, psychological distress, including mental disorders, is overlooked in 30% to 50% of patients. High workload and a constant need to optimise time and costs require a quick and easy method to identify patients likely to miss out on psychological support.

methodsUsing machine learning, factors associated with no consultation with a clinical psychologist or psychiatrist were identified between 2011 and 2019 in 7,318 oncological patients in a large cancer treatment centre. Parameters were hierarchically ordered based on statistical relevance. Nested resampling and cross validation were performed to avoid overfitting.

resultsPatients were least likely to receive psycho-oncological (i.e., psychiatric/psychotherapeutic) treatment when they were not formally screened for distress, had inpatient treatment for less than 28 days, had no psychiatric diagnosis, were aged 65 or older, had skin cancer or were not being discussed in a tumour board. The final validated model was optimised to maximise sensitivity at 85.9% and achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.75, a balanced accuracy of 68.5% and specificity of 51.2%.

conclusionBeyond conventional screening tools, results might contribute to identify patients at risk to be neglected in terms of referral to psycho-oncology within routine oncological care.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsSkin NeoplasmsAgedHumansMachine LearningMedical OncologyPsycho-OncologyReferral and Consultationcancermachine learningmental disorderspsychological supportpsycho-oncology

Identifiers

PMID35137480
PMCPMC9286797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.