ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2023
A Novel Radiological Score System to Assess the Clinical Severity in Patients with Acute Cerebellitis.
Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Are there any differences between adult-onset cerebellitis and childhood cerebellitis?Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Article
- COVID-19-Associated Cerebellitis: A Case Report and Rehabilitation Outcome.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To develop a radiological score system to assess the severity of acute cerebellitis (AC) and to compare radiological severity score at the onset to cerebellar atrophy at follow-up. Clinical and MRI findings were recorded in 16 patients with AC. Radiological severity score considering topographic patterns, gray/white matter involvement, enhancement, tonsillar herniation or hydrocephalus development and clinical severity score taking into account clinical symptoms were assessed for each patient at the onset of the symptoms. Radiological and neurological sequelae were assessed at follow-up. At symptoms onset, clinical severity scale ranged from mild to severe and radiological severity score ranged from 3 to 7 with higher scores indicating a greater severity. The cut-off value of 5 for radiological score well segregated severe patients defined by clinical scale. A significant correlation between clinical scale and radiological severity scores (p < 0.001, r = 0.75) was found. At follow-up visit, all children developed cerebellar atrophy and 5 children showed neurologic sequelae while adults showed complete resolution without atrophy. Patients in whom atrophy was not observed had both older ages (p < 0.001) and a focal cerebellar involvement (p = 0.03). In patients with AC, radiological severity score may be a useful tool in evaluating clinical severity, but it is not capable to predict neither neurological sequelae nor evolution towards atrophy. Cerebellar atrophy, observed in children with AC, may be caused by several factors such as the age of patient and the extension of cerebellar involvement and it may be counterbalanced by neuronal restoring processes due to neuroplasticity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.