ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2022
Changing profile of platelet activity and turnover indices during treatment response of immune thrombocytopenia.
Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Haemostasis alterations in immune thrombocytopenia and their clinical significance.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
- Novel Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Monitoring of Immune Thrombocytopenia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Both platelet count and function change after treatment of immune thrombocytopenia. Platelet function can be measured by plasma markers, including platelet activity [e.g., soluble P-selectin (sP-selectin) and soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L)] and platelet turnover markers [e.g., glycocalicin (GC)]. Patients were classified into no response (NR, including new diagnosis), partial response (PR) and complete response (CR). One hundred and sixteen samples (29 CR, 32 PR, 55 NR) from 79 patients were collected. Plasma markers (sP-selectin, sCD40L and GC) were measured by ELISA. Platelet counts and mean platelet volume (MPV) were obtained in the clinical laboratory using GenS System-2. The results showed that responsive patients (PR + CR) had higher levels of sP-selectin (P = 0.026) and sCD40L (P = 0.001). Although there was no difference in MPV (P = 0.077) or GC (P = 0.078), there was a marked decrease of GC index (P < 0.001) in responsive patients. Paired sample analysis showed no difference in sP-selectin, sCD40L, MPV or GC but significant difference in GC index (P = 0.017) between NR and PR. Another paired sample analysis showed no difference in sP-selectin, sCD40L, MPV or GC but significant difference in GC index (P = 0.029) between PR and CR. Patients with refractory and newly diagnosed disease had a significant difference in GC (P = 0.020) and sCD40L (P = 0.001), despite similarly low platelet counts. In conclusion, platelet activity markers (sP-selectin and sCD40L) and GC indices change in parallel with treatment response. Plasma levels of GC and sCD40L may be predictors of treatment response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.