ArticleObesity surgery2022
Safety of Primary Versus Revisional Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch in Patients with Super Obesity Using the MBSAQIP database.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent Advances in Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Narrative Review of Therapeutic Strategies for Weight Loss and Metabolic Health.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026Review
- Impact of Increasing Robotic Bariatric Utilization on Duodenal Switch Procedure Outcomes.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Outcomes Comparison Between Primary and Revisional Duodenal Switch in Patients with a BMI Greater than 55 kg/mJournal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic bariatric procedures in super-obese patients: clinical and economic outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- Single- Versus Double-Anastomosis Duodenal Switch: Outcomes Stratified by Preoperative BMI.Obesity surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFor patients with super obesity (BMI > 50 kg/m MATERIALS AND
methodsThe MBSAQIP database was queried for primary and revisional BPD/DS (2015-2018). Inclusion criteria were patients ≥ 18 years of age, BMI > 50 kg/m
resultsThere were 3,378 primary BPD/DS and 487 revisional BPD/DS patients. Primary BPD/DS patients had higher BMI (56.5 [IQR4.4] versus 54.8 [IQR4] kg/m
conclusionsRevisional BPD/DS is associated with higher morbidity than primary BPD/DS in patients with super obesity. These patients should thus be counselled appropriately when choosing a primary or revisional bariatric procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.