Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35137276›Full record

ReviewHerzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie2022

Big Data in electrophysiology.

Sotirios Nedios, Konstantinos Iliodromitis, Christopher Kowalewski, Andreas Bollmann, Gerhard Hindricks, Nikolaos Dagres, Harilaos Bogossian

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. [Unstoppable innovations in electrophysiology].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sotirios NediosDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at the University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. sotirios.nedios@helios-gesundheit.de.
Konstantinos IliodromitisDepartment of Cardiology and Rhythmology, Ev. Krankenhaus Hagen, Hagen, Germany.
Christopher KowalewskiDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at the University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Andreas BollmannDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at the University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Gerhard HindricksDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at the University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Nikolaos DagresDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at the University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Harilaos BogossianDepartment of Cardiology and Rhythmology, Ev. Krankenhaus Hagen, Hagen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quantity of data produced and captured in medicine today is unprecedented. Technological improvements and automation have expanded the traditional statistical methods and enabled the analysis of Big Data. This has permitted the discovery of new associations with a granularity that was previously hidden to human eyes. In the first part of this review, the authors would like to provide an overview of basic Machine Learning (ML) principles and techniques in order to better understand their application in recent publications about cardiac arrhythmias. In the second part, ML-enabled advances in disease detection and diagnosis, outcome prediction, and novel disease characterization in topics like electrocardiography, atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrhythmias, and cardiac devices are presented. Finally, the limitations and challenges of applying ML in clinical practice, such as validation, replication, generalizability, and regulatory issues, are discussed. More carefully designed studies and collaborations are needed for ML to become feasible, trustworthy, accurate, and reproducible and to reach its full potential for patient-oriented precision medicine.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationBig DataCardiac ElectrophysiologyElectrocardiographyHumansMachine LearningArrhythmiasAutomationData captureMachine learningPrecision medicine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.