Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35137219›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2022

Novel Nicotine Concentration Labels Improve Adolescents' and Young Adults' Understanding of the Nicotine Strength of Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Products.

Meghan E Morean, Olivia A Wackowski, Thomas Eissenberg, Cristine D Delnevo, Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin, Ralitza Gueorguieva

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Investigating the Appeal of Nicotine Pouch Packaging, Flavour, and Nicotine Descriptors Among Adults in the UK: An Online Experiment.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Preventive medicine reports · 2025
    Article
  4. Attitudes, Behaviors, and Perceptions of Students Vaping in Three Mexican Universities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Meghan E MoreanYale School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4865-1155
Olivia A WackowskiCenter for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9159-5473
Thomas EissenbergVirginia Commonwealth University, Department of Psychology, Richmond, VA, USA.
Cristine D DelnevoCenter for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9597-4307
Suchitra Krishnan-SarinYale School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, New Haven, CT, USA.
Ralitza GueorguievaYale School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0944-5973
Yale University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Yale Center for the Study of Tobacco Product Use and Addiction (YCSTP) Project 2: Addictive Threshold of Nicotine and the Impact of SweetenersU54DA036151 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI LISA M FUCITO · 2018 to 2026
$41.6M
Project 4: Using a prospective cohort survey to test population-level predictions generated by Projects 1-3U54DA036105 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI FAGAN, PEBBLES · 2018 to 2022
$20.8M
Tobacco Industry Marketing CoreU54CA229973 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CAPPELLA, JOSEPH NICHOLAS · 2018 to 2022
$18.8M
Perceptions and Impact of Modified Risk Tobacco Product Communication MessagesR37CA222002 · NCI · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WACKOWSKI, OLIVIA · 2018 to 2023
$2.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS R37 CA222002NCI NIH HHS U54 CA229973NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA036105NIDA NIH HHS U54 DA036151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionE-cigarette liquid nicotine concentrations typically are labeled as mg/mL or percent, which poorly convey nicotine strength to users. We evaluated whether four novel nicotine concentration labels better convey information about nicotine strength and addictiveness.

methodsAdolescents and young adults (N = 826) completed an online survey in 2020. Participants rated nicotine concentrations (3, 6, 18, 30, 40, and 50 mg/mL) from "no nicotine" to "very high nicotine" communicated using current market labels (mg/mL, percent) and four new labels (text-based, caution sign-shaped, horizonal stoplight, vertical thermometer) which used color, symbols, and verbal strength descriptors. Participants reported on perceived addictiveness for all labels viewed and rank-ordered labels on perceived ability to convey information accurately.

resultsParticipants ranked the vertical (77%) and horizontal (70%) labels in first or second place and mg/mL (59.1%) and percent (47.2%) in last or second-to-last place. All new labels conveyed nicotine strength more accurately than did market labels (M[SD] correct of 6: percent = 1.50[1.08]; mg/mL = 2.14[1.52]; caution = 5.23[1.37]; vertical thermometer = 5.28[1.51]; text = 5.33[1.36]; horizontal stoplight = 5.47[1.14]), with the horizontal label also outperforming the thermometer and caution labels. Underestimating nicotine strength was uncommon among all new labels (4.7-6.8%). The new labels also were associated with increased perceived addictiveness at higher concentrations (30, 40, and 50 mg/mL), although the thermometer label underperformed the others. When considering perceived nicotine strength, rates of strength underestimates, perceived addictiveness, and rank ordering, the horizontal stoplight label performed best.

conclusionsNovel labeling could improve understanding of nicotine strength and e-cigarette-related risk. IMPLICATIONS: Extending prior research showing that adolescents and young adults who use Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) have difficulty understanding nicotine concentrations labeled using mg/mL and percent nicotine, the current study demonstrates that novel nicotine concentration labels can improve understanding of nicotine strength and influence perceptions of addictiveness among young ENDS users. While four novel labels were tested, each outperforming current market labeling, the novel label that resembles a horizontal stoplight performed best. The study provides proof-of-concept that creating an easy-to-understand nicotine concentration label is possible and that new labeling better conveys information about nicotine strength and addictiveness.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsAdolescentHumansNicotineProduct LabelingYoung AdultNicotine

Identifiers

PMID35137219
PMCPMC9199936
OpenAlexW4207040422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.